1995 Honda Civic h/b tire size puzzle - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-22-2007, 01:42 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 244
Country: United States
1995 Honda Civic h/b tire size puzzle

Background: Recently swapped a CX tranny into my DX. Before the swap, odometer was registering 2.5% too many miles. Per Firestone specs, my F380 tires (size 175/70/13) spun 919 revolutions per mile. Tires only have 9,000 miles. After the swap, odometer registered 2.6% fewer miles than actual with the same tires.

I was looking to buy new LRR tires (Sumitomo HTR T4) b/c the Firestones are not LRR and are better saved for the winter due to their great traction. I figured I could correct the odometer error by purchasing a tire that spins about 943 revs per mile (919 x 1.026) and was going to buy size 165/70/13 which is 949 RPMs per Sumitomo specs. I decided to purchase size 175/70/13 at 927 RPMs instead because they were on sale for $34.99 each versus the 165s at $48 each. I estimated these tires should cause the odometer to read about 1.6% fewer miles than actual.

When I checked the odometer for accuracy w/ my GPS, I discovered the new tires are causing the odometer to register 4% fewer miles now instead of 2.6% fewer miles with the old tires!! I measured the diameter of each tire, and they are within .002% of each other (old is 71.25 inches, new is 71.4375 inches). I can't figure out why the discrepancy got so much worse except perhaps the new tires are less flexible and therefore turn fewer RPMs than the old tires.

Any insight??
__________________

__________________
cems70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2007, 06:23 PM   #2
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalcold.html

this is the best i can do. also dont forget that tire pressure can account for a lot more than .002%
__________________

__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 04:45 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 244
Country: United States
The tire size calculator in that link doesn't help in this case because both the old and new tires are the same size: 175/70R13. And as I mentioned before, I measured the diameter of each with a tape measure and they're within .2% of each other. Same tire pressure in both tires. So, unless the old tires are much more flexible (which would cause them to turn more RPMs than the new ones???), I can't figure out why the odometer accuracy has gone from 2.6% less than actual to 4% less than actual.
__________________
cems70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 02:50 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
VetteOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
Country: United States
ok so you swapped trannys now your speedo/odometers off...its either the electronic speed sensor is different between the 2 trannys or if thier a cable driven spedo then the little gear running it is different.

if it is electronic then one might have been on a tolerance level one end of th spectrum and the other on the other end. (usually if its within 2mph then its within tolerance)
VetteOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 06:12 PM   #5
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
Quote:
Originally Posted by cems70 View Post
perhaps the new tires are less flexible and therefore turn fewer RPMs than the old tires.
then you said it yourself. i cant think of any other explanation, other than tire flex while the cars weight is on it.
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 07:49 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
If it's really bugging you, you could put them back on the car, measure the rolling diameter while in use, and see if you agree with the manufacturer as far as revs per mile.

Ooo, ooo, I figured it out, maybe. The spec is for a tire at full tread depth. you were comparing worn old tires to full tread new tires. That makes a pretty stout difference, esp in a small tire like yours.
__________________
Bill in Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 03:28 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_bobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 463
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by thisisntjared View Post
i cant think of any other explanation, other than tire flex while the cars weight is on it.
I don't think that would make a difference. The tread is steel belted... It's not going to get shorter or longer, and the tread isn't going to gradually drift around the tire relative to the bead and rim.
Think about a tank tread. Each segment of the tread covers a fixed distance when it's layed down under the tank wheels. There's a fixed number of segments in a given tread. Now imagine marking a preticular segment, and counting each time it passes as a revolution. Since there's a set number of segments in the tread, and thus per revolution, and each segment covers a fixed distance (assuming the tread doesn't slip on the ground), the tread will cover a fixed distance per revolution.
Now immagine taking that same tread off the tank, and erecting it into a perfect circle, like the tread of a tire. The number of segments or the distance they each cover hasn't changed, only how many of them are touching the ground at once. So, the distance per revolution must still be the same.
GasSavers_bobski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 05:34 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
VetteOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
Country: United States
thats why im saying the sensor is within a different tolerance... i swapped a spedo out of a 83 chevette into my 80, same tranny same wheel sizes and it reads 3 high going 55...its just the little clock spring on the needle shaft is a little bit weaker than the old one...

same thing is happening to your car. so if its relaly a huge concern for you swap in a new speed sensor and i guarentee its probably going to read different from your other 2.

btw you should have done several test runs with your gps. i have a handheld one and cloudy days it isnt as accurate...(still close but off a tad)
VetteOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 05:54 PM   #9
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
my point is, car tires are not tank treads, a tanks treads are driven by a gear, a cars treads are driven by the sidewall, which flexes and varies from tires to tire. all tires allow slippage in the treads, especially during acceleration and deceleration and different tire designs allow different amounts of slippage.

i am not too sure how to quantify it, i just know it happens. i also know that the shorter the tread, the less slippage is permitted, depending on the compound.
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 06:33 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 244
Country: United States
"If it's really bugging you, you could put them back on the car, measure the rolling diameter while in use, and see if you agree with the manufacturer as far as revs per mile.

Ooo, ooo, I figured it out, maybe. The spec is for a tire at full tread depth. you were comparing worn old tires to full tread new tires. That makes a pretty stout difference, esp in a small tire like yours."

Bill, the old tires (Firestone) only had about 9000 miles on them, so tread depth shouldn't make a huge difference. Besides, I measured the circumference of the old and new tires, and they were within .2% of each other. This is why I'm perplexed about why the odometer is now registering 4% low w/ the new tires when it was only registering 2.6% low with the old tires. It must be the flex in the old tires causing more RPMs.

"ok so you swapped trannys now your speedo/odometers off...."

Vette, the speedo is actually precise now, whereas before the tranny swap it was about 2 - 3 mph high at 60 mph. The odometer changed from being 1.6% high to 2.6% low. I figured the new tires w/ a claimed 927 RPMs versus old tires w/ a claimed 919 RPMs would make the odometer a little more accurate...like closer to only 1.7% low instead of 2.6% low.

I did not swap my speed sensor from the DX tranny to the CX tranny because the CX tranny had a broken bolt on it, and I didn't want to mess around with it. I may swap them now to see if it makes a difference. It certainly can't get any worse than 4%!
__________________

__________________
cems70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2012 cars 306maxi Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 04-29-2011 05:23 AM
Installed 195F Coolant Thermostat ... Reset ECU? cfg83 General Maintenance and Repair 13 04-06-2011 12:54 PM
iphone experience bearmeister Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 02-10-2010 11:25 PM
new link for Mobile after submit Pontiac Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 02-07-2009 05:48 AM
Neutralizing Our Environmental Impact SVOboy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 9 09-01-2006 07:23 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.