Wouldn't it be better to have a valve cover breather rather than having a tube going from the valve cover back to the intake??? - Page 6 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > General Maintenance and Repair
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-26-2006, 01:28 PM   #51
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Re: Quote:So the difference

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Timion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compaq888
I need the 2.4 liter because the car is extremly heavy. I will still find ways to improve fuel economy. I'm still at 40psi and I still haven't used the auto-rx. Not to mention once I get a new air hose the flow will get better.
I think there is a misconception that people "NEED" bigger engines. Many other manufacturers have the same weight (if not heavier) cars on smaller engines. Hondas from the same time period as your car had 1.6L or 1.8L engines in them.

You really only need about 10HP to drive around town, and about 20HP to maintain speeds on the freeway.

This is a lot like when I had my 4.0L Jeep. I didn't NEED that big of an engine, but I still had it. The car wasn't heavy, I wasn't climbing rock faces or towing anything. The car just had it because that's what jeeps have.

If you put a smaller engine in your car (even a 2.0) I bet that the difference would be minimal.
Maybe I'll be like you guys and in the future do an engine swap for a more economical more powerful engine. There are already 2.0 engines that get better fuel economy than mine and have 50 more hp. That engine is in the new civic SI and RSX type S. The current 2.4 liters already have 160hp and get 24 for city and 34 for freeway. So far I can match that but barely. What I really need is engine management. Not only I'd have more power but i'd have better fuel economy. Maybe get some taller tires.
__________________

__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 01:34 PM   #52
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Engine management on a stock

Engine management on a stock car won't get you much really. I mean you could lean it out to 20:1 but you'd have no power and your engine would die relatively quickly. The k24 isn't really a miracle engine either, I'm kind of meh on it because for only 160 hp you can do a lot better for gas mileage.
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 02:09 PM   #53
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Right now i'm doing 22-23 on

Right now i'm doing 22-23 on the street and 32-33 on the freeway. Find me a car that is the same age with a 2.4 and a automatic???

Engine management on a stock car has been shown to get 30-40whp. Example. Some shop put a AEM EMS on a 240sx that had a intake and after they dynoed it with the EMS it gained 40whp. The car comes stock with 160hp. Which is about 130whp, so 170whp is a huge difference.
__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 02:14 PM   #54
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I'd like to see this stock

I'd like to see this stock car that gained 40 whp.

Also, my point is that a 2.4 is not necessary. Honda has put 2.0 in there trucks in the past and never heard a peep saying it wasn't enough.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 02:30 PM   #55
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Re: I'd like to see this stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
I'd like to see this stock car that gained 40 whp.

Also, my point is that a 2.4 is not necessary. Honda has put 2.0 in there trucks in the past and never heard a peep saying it wasn't enough.
You know nissan, they like to go big. Maybe they are trying to take the attention away from the crappy interior.LOL
__________________

__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.