WOT shifting for autos - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-11-2006, 04:20 PM   #1
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
WOT shifting for autos

I seem to be the only on here that believe in the merits of WOT shifting; I also happen to drive an auto so I can't practice it much.

However, since I no longer am able to use my kickdown cable (tells the tranny when to shift based on pedal pressure) I can rig it up any way I like. I plan to stretch it only as much as needed so that it always shifts at 1800, no matter what. This will allow me to just floor it through all the gears and keep my rpms low, hopefully I can test this theory well.

What does we thinks?
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 04:52 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
krousdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Raleigh, NC
I look forward to some

I look forward to some results.

I plan of accelerating more briskly on this tank, although not WOT. There is a point in 5th gear, at 17 in hg and higher that my instantaneous FE spikes. The sooner I get to speed the sooner I can cruise in this high FE zone.
__________________

__________________


krousdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 04:58 PM   #3
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I have been doing it in my

I have been doing it in my mom's car but our driving styles are just too different to compare. I hope it does work, have you seen the insight forum quote about why it's supported over there?
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 05:03 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
krousdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Raleigh, NC
No but I would expect that

No but I would expect that it is for the same reason that I mentioned above. WOT means less time accelerating and more time cruising in lean burn. I think that the benefit of lean burn might outweigh any drawbacks of WOT.

But for those without lean burn, WOT may not work as well. WOT means open loop, which means less than stoich.

I dunno, just my opinion. meh
__________________


krousdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 05:07 PM   #5
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Run a search for my original

Run a search for my original thread on it and you will see the quote. The idea is mainly that you reduce pumping losses enough that in combination with getting to speed quicker you're still saving. You're prolly at 13.5:1 or so when you're at WOT, it could prolly be tuned down a bit also.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 05:13 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
krousdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Raleigh, NC
Yes, the target afr at WOT

Yes, the target afr at WOT (for my ecu) is about 13.5. I plan on changing that to 14.7 so that I won't have a WOT penalty. In that case, I would agree with your WOT theory.
__________________


krousdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 05:14 PM   #7
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Well, even with that

Well, even with that decrease the fuel injected at WOT will still be a large amount above greater vacuum. Also, there's a lot of blown up engine issues when you mess with WOT afrs,
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 05:28 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
krousdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Raleigh, NC
Re: Well, even with that

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
Also, there's a lot of blown up engine issues when you mess with WOT afrs,
Hah! A blown engine will give me a good excuse to go Z1. The holy grail! :-)

It reminds me of when I bought my dad's 68 Rambler American in the early 80's, my first car. It only had 83k miles on the 199 cid inline six, three on the tree. I ran that engine in first gear, WOT for miles and miles. I could not get it to blow. Finally I had to tell a white lie to my dad that the engine blew. Thats when I put in the 401 cid and a chrysler 8 3/4 rear end. Ahhhh those were the days. NOw I am in persuit of the ultimate measure of performance... FE! :-)
__________________


krousdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 09:19 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Re: Yes, the target afr at WOT

Quote:
Originally Posted by krousdb
Yes, the target afr at WOT (for my ecu) is about 13.5. I plan on changing that to 14.7 so that I won't have a WOT penalty. In that case, I would agree with your WOT theory.
The max you could go for WOT a/f ratio is 13.5:1, anything leaner and you can easily blow your engine.
__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 05:27 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
zpiloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
WOT with the scan gauge

I've tried this with the scan gauge and there is a sweet spot where MPG drops from 6 to 2.8 with out much increase in acceleration. When I ran my 41 mile test loop(rolling terrrain with 15 stops but no traffic) the increase in MPG between each trip was an increase of .4 MPG using the near max acceleration. I do not shut the engine off(which would yeild better results) when coasting but shift into neutral. I'd be interested in the results of the lower shift point and the effects on MPG. My point is 2500 RPM.
__________________

zpiloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why fill my tank? acidtonic Fuelly Web Support and Community News 11 12-27-2010 07:27 AM
Monthly Average Cost per Mile aisbrandtsen Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 11-14-2008 07:33 AM
This is getting rediculous, LOL Compaq888 General Fuel Topics 4 11-19-2005 08:15 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.