diesel woes - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums
Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Diesels
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2008, 08:11 AM   #21
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
Who checks NOx output once the model/engine combination passes manufacturer's EPA testing? Does even CA perform a sniff test of diesels? MA, one of the other four that have adopted CA's emissions standards does not. I haven't even been checked for opacity or percent smoke output, never mind CO, HC, CO2. And that in a gasser with a diesel swap.
The limits on other emissions for gasoline powered vehicles are in parts per hundred (%) or per million (ppm), not mass per mile.

Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 10:24 AM   #22
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Country: United States
Originally Posted by Erdrick View Post
Yeah, the real problem is that it still is handled by states like that. We need a federal-run program that could tie the country together with rail. I still think that Americans are too spread out for that to ever work though. Our population density just isn't suited to rail.
I agree with the Federal Rail system, but I think you have it entirely backwards that the US is too big for rail to be much use. Long distances are perfect for rail, and transcontinental rail is much cheaper than transcontinental trucking. If anything, the country is too big for trucks.

There are actualy truckers that drive cross country to deliver the equivalent of ONE rail car's worth of goods. That's simpy crazy.

I've often thought that a hybrid rail-truck system would be best. Ship trucks on trains and then offload them and use the trucks to deliver locally (or regionally). Of course the most efficient system would be to ship containers that became trailers to be delivered locally by local tractors, but the trucking industry is too conservative to give up their way of life. Loading trucks onto rail cars like those used to transport trucks through the Channel Tunnel would be a good compromise. The truckers could hang out in the club/sleeping cars and socialize rather than spending days clogging the roads and wasting fuel. When they get to a rail hub near thier destination their trucks are simply offloaded and new trucks loaded.

A truck getting 5 MPG travelling 2,000 miles uses 400 gallons of fuel. At $4/gallon that's $1,600 in fuel alone! The true cost (oil, tires, maintenance, depreciation, tolls, road taxes, tickets, etc) would probably be more like $4,000. What trucker wouldn't pay $1,000 to have him and his truck shipped the same distance (zero miles on the odometer) while watching satellite TV in the lounge car?

As for passenger cars, do the same for them. There used to be that service between NY and Florida called the CarTrain.

instarx is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server Time ynpmoose Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 12-20-2013 11:53 AM
All Licensed Drivers terrapin Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 08-07-2008 09:49 AM
Amazed by the SGII GeekGuyAndy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 7 08-18-2007 11:25 PM
Scan Gauge 2 How it works popimp General Fuel Topics 15 06-20-2007 05:46 PM
PepsiCo Connections? SVOboy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 3 10-12-2006 04:52 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.