Civic hatchback aerodynamics - Page 9 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-18-2006, 12:26 AM   #81
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
I wish I had 2 cars. One for daily driving(interior gutted, no PS, weight reduction, Scangauge 2, aero mods) and another car to take dates, go to movies with friends and etc.
__________________

__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 01:29 AM   #82
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
MetroMPG -

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
I noticed also the lack of passenger seat
This should be a number one weight reduction item. If you have a garage to store it (no long haul to put it somewhere) and a quick-release rail system, removing it for the weekly commute would be very convenient. My Saturn uses 4 heavy bolts to connect the seat, so I would have to retrofit a slider system. I have removed the seat for moving in the past and I like the roomy feel of the interior without the seat, so it's a definite plus.

The sliders already exist for after-market seats :



Does the Fit have removable rear seats?

CarloSW2
__________________

__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 06:38 PM   #83
Registered Member
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 392
Country: United States
So far (at 210miles) my gas gause is much higher than it would normally be with this many miles on the tank, despite 120 miles of driving in rain and wet roads. The tail end of a 2 mile long coast on my way home from work really drove home the overall improvements that the aero mods have made to my car's coasting ability. At the point on the road where my car's speed would normally have dropped down to 35mph in its pre-aero days, I am now doing 50mph and I can roll on for another quarter mile down the road before I have to restart the engine.
__________________
]
aerocivic.com
basjoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 07:17 PM   #84
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Eagerly looking forward to your next fill-up basjoos.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 07:33 PM   #85
Registered Member
 
The Toecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 612
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to The Toecutter
Man, if only our cars had such a boattail built into them.

Te auto industry clainms going aero would reduce storage space, but that clearly is a crock of ****. Your design could have easily been incorporated to double usable trunk space while perhaps improving FE by 15%.

If you get 80-85 mpg highway, I will not be surprised.
The Toecutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 07:52 PM   #86
Registered Member
 
kickflipjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 933
Country: United States
basjoos you are hardcore. I hope you see a big gain.
__________________
2008 EPA adjusted:


Distance traveled by bicycle in 2007= 1,830ish miles
Average commute speed=25mph (yes, that's in a car)
kickflipjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 08:04 PM   #87
Registered Member
 
theclencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 542
Country: United States
I like what basjoos is doing for sure, but if the long term average from that boattail alone goes from 70 to 80-85 I would be surprised.

Time will tell.
__________________
Tempo/Topaz:
Old EPA 23/33/27
New EPA 21/30/24

F150:
New EPA12/14/17

theclencher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 11:27 PM   #88
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Toecutter
Your design could have easily been incorporated to double usable trunk space while perhaps improving FE by 15%.
Yeah , you could easily fit a body in there now , err , I mean , all your shopping
onegammyleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2006, 05:55 PM   #89
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
i think it could even be more streamlined, the plastic behind the extends from the side windows should be angled in closer. that mid frame should be like a trapezoid instead of being a rectangle. i bet he will get great gains, but its amazing that there is still more!
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2006, 06:26 PM   #90
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Toecutter
Your design could have easily been incorporated to double usable trunk space while perhaps improving FE by 15%.

If you get 80-85 mpg highway, I will not be surprised.
My tiny kardboard Kammback (I know it's not technically a Kammback ) netted a 2.3% gain @ 55 mph. I can't estimate what basjoos' full tail will yield, but it's going to be way more than that.

__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Login inconsistencies mobile vs. PC GeneLeyden Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-08-2008 02:22 AM
EV Smartcar zpiloto Electric and Solar powered 0 07-21-2006 05:48 PM
FE Test after Wheels, Spoilers, Added to HCH II: Pics & Techniques: tigerhonaker Automotive News, Articles and Products 0 07-14-2006 03:03 PM
METRO DISPOSAL XFi General Discussion (Off-Topic) 5 04-10-2006 09:58 PM
google earth MetroMPG Experiments, Modifications and DIY 13 03-14-2006 08:32 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.