Filling in the wake? - Fuelly Forums
Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-28-2008, 08:07 AM   #1
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
Country: United States
Filling in the wake?

My daily driver is a '92 Chrysler LeBaron sedan (see pic in the garage).
Aerodynamically, it has one glaring flaw that I have been thinking about for some time - the rear glass is near vertical. Judging by the actions of dew droplets on my rear glass, the airflow over my rear glass and trunklid is entirely seperated anywhere above about 45-50mph.

What I have been thinking of is to create some sort of vent that would connect the underbody of the car to the trunklid area just behind the rear glass. In theory, I believe that this would reduce the low pressure area behind the window providing both a reduction in drag and in lift. I plan to take some basic pressure measurements using a water manometer to verify a pressure gradient between these two places before cutting holes, but I was wondering what other peoples ideas are as well. Any thoughts?


GasSavers_BluEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:27 PM   #2
Registered Member
GasSavers_BEEF's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,831
some would say VGs to create vortexes in that area. I am still unsure of these as I have no experience with it.

another thought is to make a plexi glass fairing (I hope I said that right) that extends from the top of the cab as far back as you can stand. not sure if you use your trunk but if you don't, you could go all the way back to there angling it down slightly (I have heard 10 degrees but that may be wrong). others have done this in cars like the metro to get better FE. and basjoos has taken it to an entire boat tail design which has put him in the top 10 (at least he used to be, not sure now) his car is "keeps on rollin'". I don't recomend doing that but you could use the plexiglass to make a slight extension even if you do have to use the trunk. this is not my car but hopefully it will give you an idea of what I am talking about. also plexi-glass is clear so it may be safer.

Be the change you wish to see in the world
--Mahatma Gandhi

GasSavers_BEEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:06 PM   #3
Registered Member
theholycow's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
I don't think you're going to be able to use large enough ducts and vents to do the job in a useful way. A fairing would probably be better but of course it's going to be ugly.
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2008, 10:19 AM   #4
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
Late 60's Olds Toronado had just such louvers, but for interior "flow-thru" venting, not undercar air diversion.
Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CRX HF Transmission Rebuild GasSavers_DaX General Fuel Topics 35 09-15-2010 03:37 AM
Holy EOC! GeekGuyAndy Hypermiling 14 08-08-2007 05:49 AM
Best tank on my dsl smart car GasSavers_Antoine Diesels 22 07-13-2007 08:47 AM
92 MX-3 B6 1.6 with SOHC? jj94auto General Fuel Topics 5 05-01-2007 02:40 AM
Funny comments from women I know. Compaq888 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 10 02-11-2007 09:29 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.