frontal area (A) - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-19-2007, 04:37 AM   #11
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneinchsidehop View Post
There's an easier way. Just move back, way back and crop. The perspective in the center 1/3 of a 50mm lens is the same as, say a 100mm lens.
That's interesting - didn't know that.

Quote:
You would have to move back the same amount using a flash light or laser pointer to get results with the same level of distortion.
Well, only if you were planning to fix the light/laser at a single point while tracing the shadow.


Quote:
But I think you should drive through a snowbank... and post a video.
That would definitely be the most fun.
__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:09 AM   #12
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Here's another method:



Hey, I'm not saying it's practical/easy - or more fun than a snowbank. Just an idea.
__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:16 AM   #13
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
Great Cesars ghost, If the cardboard is uniform, you could measure it's area and weigh it, then trim it and weigh it again, and figure out the area removed that way, arrgh.
__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:22 AM   #14
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
That could work.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:57 AM   #15
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 313
Country: United States
You could do it with a laser, but it would drive you and your assistant nuts, especially if you don't have an assistant.

On level ground, put a blank canvass in front or behind your car. The canvass could be the drywall at the back of the garage or cardboard or anything for that matter as long as it is a flat surface and large enough.

The someone at the other end shines the laser at the edge of the cars surface, where the laser disappears, the assistant marks a dot. The laser has to stay parallel and level the whole time. The level part is easy, just mount it on a 4' level. The parallel part would be tougher, but you could draw parallel lines on the ground and use a jointed parallelogram base for the level. Just make sure it always in line with grid lines.

It would be a ton of work, but you'd get a nice profile on the canvass that could be measured pretty easily!
__________________
2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 01:05 PM   #16
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneinchsidehop View Post
There's an easier way. Just move back, way back and crop. The perspective in the center 1/3 of a 50mm lens is the same as, say a 100mm lens.
Well I'll be!
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 06:29 AM   #17
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
2x optical zoom, from close up, medium & faaaar away. Look at the rear tires in each to see diminishing perspective "distortion". (Or the apparent height of the roof line.)
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 08:15 PM   #18
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19
Country: United States
I am impressed by the talent displayed in these posts. My way is pretty simple-minded...

I did a google image search for a Beetle (my car). Most cars have pictures on-line that are straight-on front views. I got the height and width from car dimensions. Then, I printed the car picture onto a sheet of graph paper stuck in my printer. I counted the number of squares in the image and used horizontal and vertical scale factors to get the area. Yes, different scale corrections were needed since the picture was distorted by somebody to make it look more sexy.

The number I got: 23 square feet for my 2003 New Beetle.

So, I have a technical question-- should the area under the car be counted as part of the frontal area?

Now, why do we need the frontal area? ANS: drag coefficients are routinely published but frontal areas are not. You need CdA to calculate the drag.

Measuring CdA directly (measuring the drag) is a fairly easy thing to do. Start with the easy formula--

F = m a = CdA 1/2 rho V^2 + Crr m g

Rho is air density. You can get that with the help of the airport-- they can give you pressure and temperature and may have the density as well. In metric units, it will be about 1.2 kg /cu.meter. V is the speed of the car in meters per second: mph x .447 = meters /sec. m is the mass of the car in kilograms. 1 kg = 2.2 pounds. Crr is the tire rolling resistance coefficient, which you will find out in the calculation. And, g is the gravity constant, about 9.81

Take your car out to a level, straight section of road when there is no wind or traffic and no cops are around. Take a stopwatch or something like runners use. Go as fast as reasonable, say 80, shift to neutral and start coasting. Start the watch when the speed crosses 75, then click it at 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, ..., 25, 20, 15, well, maybe 10. Do that both directions about three times and average the numbers. Then, carefully check your speedometer and correct the gage readings to true speed. Now you have a good set of numbers.

Make a graph of speed versus time. Take your car to an accurate truck scale and find out how much it weighs. Have the scale operator do it both with you in the car and out. The difference should be close to your correct weight.

Okay, the slope of the curve is the car's acceleration, a = F /m. Draw a straight line tangent to the curve at a very high speed, say, 60, and at a very low speed, say, 20. (Don't worry about where the straight line touches the curve, just read the speed where it does.)

Now you have all the stuff you need to calculate CDA, which will be in square meters.

Can you guess a value for either CdA or Crr? CdA will be around 0.7 sq.m. Crr will usually be in the range from 0.012 to 0.007, depending on the quality and condition of your tires and their pressure.

You might plug all your numbers into the equation at the low speed tangent, with a guess for CdA = 0.7 and calculate the only remaining unknown, Crr. (The answer isn't sensitive to your guess for CdA at low speed.) Then, plug that into the high speed case and calculate the CdA. (Which isn't sensitive to Crr at high speed.) Go around one more time, plugging in the new CdA, etc., and the calculated numbers should begin to "converge," repeat themselves. And, then you have both the CdA and the Crr for your car.

The numbers for my car:

Crr = 0.0065
A = 23 sq.ft.
Cd = 0.30

I have very low rolling resistance tires and I have a drag reducer to bring down my Cd. There are pictures at www.max-mpg.com

Ernie Rogers
Ernie Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 08:25 PM   #19
Registered Member
 
trebuchet03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 812
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to trebuchet03
^^
That's similar to this - but the goal was finding cD and cRR
http://www.instructables.com/id/Meas...t-of-your-car/

Some of us don't have a stock cD

Quote:
So, I have a technical question-- should the area under the car be counted as part of the frontal area?
Nope -- that doesn't count. Interactions down there will be included as part of cD
__________________
Time is the best teacher. Unfortunately it kills all its students.


Bike Miles (Begin Aug. 20 - '07): ~433.2 miles

11/12
trebuchet03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2007, 12:15 AM   #20
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
That could work.

Or, get yourself a planimeter.
What devilry is this planimeter? You can integrate an arbitrary shape into an area with a simple skidding wheel? That's pretty cool!
__________________

__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Average MPG graphs misleading jostlehim Fuelly Web Support and Community News 9 04-16-2011 12:35 AM
iPhone App? cblaz Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 09-04-2008 01:17 AM
FREE D15B7 almost complete motor UfoTofU For Sale 7 02-20-2007 05:37 PM
Another new one - Any other Wisconsinites? hoffmann277 Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 9 10-24-2006 02:28 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.