Rear spoilers........ - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-23-2006, 08:25 PM   #11
Registered Member
 
ZugyNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 587
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
This would also explain the shape at the top of my car's hatchback, and around the upper half of the hatch glass, which I've always wondered about. It's a built-in spoiler, meant to force flow separation early to avoid the negative effects of having the flow wrapping partway onto the glass before going turbulent.

I'll get a pic and post it tomorrow.

Moral: everyone, go outside with your duct tape and cardboard and square off all your cars' trailing edge radii.
Looks like the small spoiler keeps the TOP air flow going straight back and then the low pressure area at back is filled by air from the SIDES?

If you look at the Airtabs applications...that might be how they work...causing a straight sheet of air...a clean break?

I was assuming that they caused the boundary layer to follow around the curve into the lower pressure area behind the car.

If you look at how the Airtabs are made...look like they lift a stream of air in the center and force it out away from the surface plane to some extent? Between the Airtabs seems like there would be a lower pressure area that might supply air to the center??

Whereas the vgs I made induce trailing vortexes. By placing them 4" apart...the 2 vortexes from ajoining vgs counter-rotate and shouldn't interfere with each other.

My ZX has a small spoiler at back...so maybe the top vgs help to keep the air more down on it...while the side vgs help air getting around the back...or maybe hinder it?
__________________

__________________
Leading the perpetually ignorant and uninformed into the light of scientific knowledge. Did I really say that?

a new policy....I intend to ignore the nescient...a waste of time and energy.
ZugyNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2006, 09:01 PM   #12
Registered Member
 
Mighty Mira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Country: United States
I think that the jury on this is going to be out until we get enough people testing these things in a rigorous manner.
__________________

Mighty Mira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 01:16 AM   #13
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 85
Country: United States
Spoilers

So it would probably be beneficial to extend the spoiler down the sides of the hatch also...
__________________
"If the engine ain't running it ain't using gas!"
GasSavers_Kraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 04:15 AM   #14
Registered Member
 
ZugyNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 587
Country: United States
Here is a pic of the kind of vgs I use on the side...that are supposed to be similar in effect to the airtabs.

Far as I know...the air going into the center gets concentrated at a higher pressure than "ambient"....and the air going between them is possibly at a lower pressure than "ambient"?

Might be that the lower pressure air...fills in the large low pressure area behind the car?

These should probably be placed in a series 1" or so apart.

Here is the pattern used...found on the web...I used alum flashing material.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	airtabcloneVGs500.jpg
Views:	268
Size:	38.3 KB
ID:	17   Click image for larger version

Name:	airtabpattern500.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	20.2 KB
ID:	18  
__________________
Leading the perpetually ignorant and uninformed into the light of scientific knowledge. Did I really say that?

a new policy....I intend to ignore the nescient...a waste of time and energy.
ZugyNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 08:51 AM   #15
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 162
Country: United States
You know, I'm starting to think that it wouldn't be that difficult to make an effective lip spoiler. I had a look at my girlfriend's mother's Mercedes E300 Turbodiesel (I think it's a '99) and that has one built right into the trunk lid. It's literally just a vertical lip formed into the top of the trunk, right at the rear edge. As those sources point out it seems like it's just a matter of optimizing size and angle. I think that the tougher part would be making it look good, and then reliably measuring its effects without a wind tunnel.
__________________
'07 Toyota Prius
GasSavers_brick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 09:06 AM   #16
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
I agree: a lip spoiler is an easy item to make, and the theory behind its purpose is solid (& logical, which makes it even nicer). As for angle, I think the safest bet would be to simply extend the plane of the trunk lid. As for size, I'm less certain, but the article mentioned 20 mm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brick
think that the tougher part would be making it look good, and then reliably measuring its effects without a wind tunnel.
You can probably guess where I place looks on the scale of things

But you hit the nail on the head about reliably measuring effects.

Logically, a lip extension should improve aero. But the change will likely be small enough that on-road testing - whether coastdown based, or speed-controlled & averaged bi-dir. runs - may show nothing conclusive; the effect will likely be lost in the normal static of variability.

It's something I've been thinking about lately, since there are a number of other known aero tweaks I'd like to try, but whose individual effects (if properly executed) are known to be small. How to quantify...
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 09:09 AM   #17
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Detail of the integrated roof extension spoiler on my rear hatch (Firefly #1) that ensures clean flow separation via a sharp angle and small radius:






Above: note the hatch sides also have an integrated extension, to about 2/3 of the way down.

Why they stopped there is a question. The remaining of side-to-rear transitions are horribly large radii that would likely also benefit just as much from sharper transitions & cleaner flow separation.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 09:42 AM   #18
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 162
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
As for angle, I think the safest bet would be to simply extend the plane of the trunk lid. As for size, I'm less certain, but the article mentioned 20 mm.
Sounds fair. The other car I looked at this weekend was my girlfriend's sister's '98 BWM 328 coupe. (What can I say, their father is German-born.) Anyway, that also appears to have a built-in extension that I can only assume is designed to do the same thing. The horizontal part of the trunk lid is simply extended ~20-30mm beyond the vertical part of the trunk lid below, tapering backward (err...forward?) to meet it. It makes a lot of sense now that I know what they were trying to accomplish.
__________________
'07 Toyota Prius
GasSavers_brick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 11:15 AM   #19
Registered Member
 
ZugyNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 587
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Above: note the hatch sides also have an integrated extension, to about 2/3 of the way down.

Why they stopped there is a question. The remaining of side-to-rear transitions are horribly large radii that would likely also benefit just as much from sharper transitions & cleaner flow separation.
If you look at the oil flow plots...looks like the gradual curves at the sides allow the air to flow into the rear area to increase pressure?

The spoiler they mention is about 3/4" high and at a 20* angle to the downsloping surface.

As far as testing various vgs and ideas....if ??????? can test and find a 1.5% gain with a V6 (?) from a row of rooftop vgs...what's the issue with testing....except for the time involved?

A lighter 4 cylinder would probably show increased effects from reduced drag.
__________________
Leading the perpetually ignorant and uninformed into the light of scientific knowledge. Did I really say that?

a new policy....I intend to ignore the nescient...a waste of time and energy.
ZugyNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006, 12:24 PM   #20
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 85
Country: United States
Spoiler

Spent four hours traveling for work today. It's amazing the number of newer cars with an aero device at the rear of the roofline! Magnum, Pacifica, Caravan, Matrix, Trailblazer, Beemer and Lexus Suvs etc. Must be there for a reason....
__________________

__________________
"If the engine ain't running it ain't using gas!"
GasSavers_Kraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A suggestion to improve the site buttersnz Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 08-19-2013 09:25 AM
iphone mobile broken RicksCafe Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 01-22-2012 06:02 AM
Multiple fuel ups - same date pdqford Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 08-17-2011 01:04 PM
Nissan Altima REAR wind diffuser/belly Compaq888 General Fuel Topics 36 02-08-2006 12:10 PM
Where to get parts? What parts do we need? Matt Timion Electric and Solar powered 11 09-19-2005 08:37 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.