Big oil companies spared tax hikes - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-21-2007, 10:56 AM   #1
Tuggin at the surly bonds
 
Silveredwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 839
Country: United States
Unhappy Big oil companies spared tax hikes

<links deleted because this AP article has mysteriously disappeared>
__________________

__________________
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. - Albert Einstein
Silveredwings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 07:21 AM   #2
Supporting Member
 
88HF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Country: United States
Someone got paid.
__________________

__________________


my favorite thread
88HF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 07:34 AM   #3
...
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by 88HF View Post
Someone got paid.
Yes unfortunate ...but freedom of speech hasn't kept people from talking about that article
MnFocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 07:37 AM   #4
...
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
and now the News! :

By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 30 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked a $32 billion package of tax breaks for renewable energy that would have been financed mostly by new taxes on major oil companies.

Democrats came three votes short of overcoming a threatened GOP filibuster that was keeping the measure from being attached to a broader energy bill. Republican senators argued that the nearly $29 billion in additional taxes on major oil companies would have led to reduced production and higher gasoline prices.

Because of Republican opposition, Democrats needed 60 votes to allow the package to come up for a vote, but fell short, 57-36. With a number of senators not voting, Democrats could resurrect the measure later, though there was no immediate indication of that.

The tax proposal had some bipartisan support, but also attracted sharp criticism from many Republican senators who lined up against it.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he intends to proceed with consideration of the energy legislation with or without the tax measures. "There are still good things in the bill," he told reporters before the floor vote.

The Senate later voted 61-32 to proceed further with the energy legislation.

Senators hoped later in the day to take up a proposal to increase automobile fuel economy, which has been the focus of intense closed-door discussions in an effort to fashion a compromise that would garner enough votes to overcome strong opposition from the auto industry.

The massive tax measure marked a sharp turn from longtime congressional support of the oil industry to promoting alternative energy development and moving toward energy sources that would help deal with the growing concerns over global warming.

But Republicans complained that it was too harsh on the oil industry and could lead to oil companies reducing investments in new oil refineries and production. They also said that it could lead to higher prices for consumers.

"When you put a tax on a business it gets passed on to consumers," argued Sen. John Kyl, R-Ariz. "Instead of reducing gasoline prices, this bill is going to add to the cost of gasoline."

Kyl had earlier sought to sidetrack the tax measure, but that effort failed.

The bill's supporters dismissed suggestions that the new taxes on an industry that has had record profits in recent years would cause either less oil production or lead to higher prices at the pump.

Oil companies earned $111 billion in profits last year and at that rate stand to earn $1 trillion over the 10 years covered by the tax package, said Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., rejecting suggestions that "this is an undue burden" on oil companies.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., whose Finance Committee crafted the tax package, said the incentives for renewable and alternative fuels "will help wean ourselves away from OPEC ... from these very high gas prices."

The tax changes would have channeled $11 billion over 10 years into development of renewable fuels such as ethanol, biodiesel and power from wind turbines. It provides an additional $18 billion in other tax breaks — from tax credits to clean and renewable energy bonds — to support improvements in energy efficiency, clean coal technology, development of gas-electric hybrid cars that could be plugged into the national power grid and other alternative energy programs.

Major oil companies would have paid most of the tab.

For example, the measure would have rescind a tax break given oil companies in 2004 which was primarily aimed at helping domestic manufacturing; increase taxes paid under an oil spill liability law; and eliminate existing tax credits involving foreign oil production.

Another measure also would have imposes a new excise tax on oil produced from the Gulf of Mexico to recoup $10.7 billion in royalties that the government has been unable to retrieve because of flawed oil leasing contracts issued in 1998-99.
MnFocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 01:04 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
We all know who pays taxes, right? Not the company, but the consumer... So I'm pretty much okay with not taxing oil companies more, because then I would just have to pay the tax when I buy gasoline or natural gas.
__________________
Bill in Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 03:47 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
can we not "step up" and do the right thing w/out raising taxes?
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 08:43 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
Not when the right thing is going to cost money.

Oil is cheap right now, but it is only a matter of time before the price rises again. Better to make the investment now than scrambling at the last moment. There are also other reasons besides cost to get away from oil.
trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 10:48 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Country: United States
Location: CT
So we're currently facing one of the worst recessions in decades, and the government is still obsessed with taxing successful companies into oblivion, forcing them to cut back on workforce, or subcontracting or any number of economy boosting activities?

I heard they're planning a $175 environmental tax per head of cattle because of farts! How many people do farms employ across this nation?

Seriously... They're talking out their *** about how horrible the economy is, and other than bailouts, the only thing they're legislating is more ways to hinder the companies that drive this economy....
Wyldesoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 02:43 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by trollbait View Post
Not when the right thing is going to cost money.
the right thing i refer to would SAVE money. you know...cut pork barrels, earmarks, other "special" interests, change the tax system, and promote general accountability.

if these practices were used, i believe the tax burden could be LOWERED.
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 11:41 AM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
I was thinking of supporting alternate energy and conservation to gain a cleaner environment and reduce foreign oil use.

Cut the earmarks makes a good rallying cry, but compared to the rest of the budget, earmarks are small potatoes. To make a noticable difference in a persons taxes you would probably have to cut military, social security, and/or medicare.
__________________

trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where's the Jeep Wrangler forum? Revolution Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 04-16-2012 10:40 AM
Help! AlfieGT Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 05-23-2011 12:35 AM
A RAV4 to go with the Prius? krousdb General Discussion (Off-Topic) 31 12-30-2006 05:32 AM
Hi to everyone hawkgt647 Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 21 04-09-2006 09:11 AM
"active" aero grille slats on 06 civic concept MetroMPG General Fuel Topics 21 01-03-2006 01:02 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.