Meet the Man Who Could End Global Warming - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-18-2010, 03:34 PM   #1
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
Arrow Meet the Man Who Could End Global Warming

http://www.esquire.com/features/best...-disposal-1209
__________________

__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 06:03 PM   #2
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
Its an interesting concept. Build a reactor that runs safely on nuclear waste, and renders it inert in the process. No more storing nuclear waste for a millennium, just use it up.
__________________

__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 07:40 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_JoeBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 698
Country: United States
Nuclear waste has been, for me, the big problem with nuclear power. Get rid of the waste problem, happy days.
__________________
"We are forces of chaos and anarchy. Everything they say we are we are, and we are very proud of ourselves!" -- Jefferson Airplane

Dick Naugle says: 1. Prepare food fresh. 2. Serve customers fast. 3. Keep place clean.



GasSavers_JoeBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 07:28 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 113
Country: United States
i heard about this quite a while ago, and very excited about it! i worked in the nuclear industry for almost 4 years and want to get back into it, so no surprise there.

its actually a very sound concept, 'burning' the waste efficiently only requires a reconfiguration of the reactor and fuel bundles but thats not practical in large plants. however this idea is a stroke of genius...large supply of clean burning power while reducing our waste by a massive amount! love it already.

also ive suffered with asthma/allergies all my life so anything that gets rid of coal burning is wonderful to me. i've had days in the heat of summer where i can't go outside for long because of the smog - can't bloody well breathe right.

also for you guys that want to see electric cars a big problem has always been where do we get enough electricity for that....this answers that question rather nicely.
__________________
zero_gravity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 03:51 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
zero_gravity, I agree about everything you posted there, especially the bit about electric cars. Another car technology that would be made reasonable by a huge supply of cheap energy would be hydrogen from electrolysis. It could be used in fuel cell electric vehicles, or it could be burned in internal combustion engines.

In addition, all that coal doesn't have to be left in the ground. It can be converted into gasoline using mature technology that just doesn't get used because coal is worth enough without converting it (really, any hydrocarbon or fossil fuel can). That can extend what may be a limited supply of dinosaur juice.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 04:40 AM   #6
Site Team
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 656
Country: United States
Why is that in Esquire and not a Science publication?

-BC
__________________
Think you are saving gas? Prove it by starting a Gas Log, then conduct a proper experiment.
bobc455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 04:46 AM   #7
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
I don't know. My dad sent the article to me. He used to work in the nuclear field, so he seems to find this stuff all over the place.
__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 08:45 AM   #8
Site Team
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 656
Country: United States
I guess I'm slightly skeptical since it is in Esquire instead of a Science magazine. But whatever, I'll take it in whatever form it exists I suppose.

However, I'm more curious about how well the waste material is processed- if the initial process degrades the uranium from 99% to 95%, that still leaves a lot of potential energy to extract I suppose. However, I didn't see how well this "new" process degrades the uranium further - down to 94%? down to 5%?

In either case, part of me wants to take the wasted uranium, and instead of burying it (which seems to be the only solution right now) we could blast it off into outer space (on a trajectory that wouldn't hit any other planets) and just let the waste uranium sail toward some other galaxy somewhere in a billion trillion years. But I guess that opens the possibility that the rocket might explode in the atmosphere at/after blastoff, leaving a bit of a mess to clean up.

I live near a Nuclear plant (Seabrook, NH) and get my electricity from there. Actually, the site was initially configured for two reactors, but due to budget issues only one was ever completed. Obama mentioned possibly completing the second reactor during his campaign, although I bet he's forgotten that by now... Anyhow, I'd love to see the second reactor built, and I wonder if this is a way it could be done. (Although the PRISM plans sound like they are intended for ground-up new facilities, and not really adaptable to existing plants.)

-BC
__________________
Think you are saving gas? Prove it by starting a Gas Log, then conduct a proper experiment.
bobc455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 09:07 AM   #9
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
My understanding is that these reactors would be able to be mass produced, and shipped out on railcars. On site they could be daisy chained together. It also mentioned the possibility of converting existing coal plants to nuclear with this technology.

The idea of both types of reactors on site is an interesting one. That would mean no waste is shipped. Its created, in the first reactor, burned in the second, and rendered inert.
__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 09:28 AM   #10
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Hmm...we could put plants up near existing waste dumps to use up existing waste...
__________________

__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ice 32 Revisited bowtieguy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 1 05-31-2010 04:34 PM
Hey Rabby Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 1 05-21-2008 11:15 AM
Tire Width bowtieguy General Maintenance and Repair 4 04-02-2008 05:41 PM
Retiring the Accord soon GasSavers_brick General Discussion (Off-Topic) 6 12-10-2006 05:56 AM
Tire / Axle Ratio Calculators ... cfg83 General Maintenance and Repair 1 10-06-2006 05:16 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.