Building a Long Wheel Base Recumbent - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-12-2007, 07:52 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
Building a Long Wheel Base Recumbent

I recently caught the bug that suggests one could build a decent recumbent for much less than the purchase price of a new one, so off to garage I went . .

Ok, not quite, but I started collecting bicycle frames and parts wherever I could find them for free or cheap. So far, I've only spent about $20 on junked/recycled bikes, with the exception of a $15 set of Hayes disc calipers and the $30 Shimano triple crankset I got off of E-bay. Another $16 for the raw mild steel and I'm more or less set with all that I need to make the bike complete (but leaving a fair amount of room for improvement on other components).

One thing which I would suggest to anybody is to start out with a proven design and modify carefully from there. There are some very good reasons certain things are placed where they are, and ignoring that is just making things difficult on yourself. How do I know?

Exhibit A:



Looks like a good start on the surface doesn't it? Unfortunately there were two critical problems with the design that I opted to change.

The first thing had to do with the strength of the connections to the front and rear tubes. With the type of stress that would be placed on them, I was advised that even if the welds themselves held, they would most likely end up flattening buckling.

The other issue was that the seat tube angle is really too steep to be comfortable on a recumbent of this type. So I decided to just start over on the rear with a completely different set of rear stays from a full suspension mountain bike. The front was just reworked without the bottom bracket junction.

Here's how it looks today- and no, the wheels were neither free nor somebody elses junk.

__________________

__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 08:01 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
I also forgot to point out that the revised frame eliminated more than a foot off the length of the bike, and the head tube angle was laid back a hair more to induce a little bit of trail into the steering (the distance the contact patch follows the head pivot line). Without making that change, it might have been a quick handler, but I would've needed quick hands, and certainly no riding without hands.
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ability to comment on Fuel Tips randomic Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 08-22-2008 12:25 AM
NOS Honda N600 Grille Block on eBay GasSavers_DaX Aerodynamics 4 01-03-2007 08:50 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.