American's energy gluttony extends to homes - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-12-2007, 07:05 AM   #11
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
All TVs start sucking significant wattage as size is increased, but in order of worst to best, I believe it goes CRT, Plasma, LCD.

I think it would be epitomy of geekdom to bring a watt meter along while shopping for one. (And probably what I'll do.)
__________________

__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 05:28 PM   #12
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
good cus i am thinking about buying a 40in lcd tv
__________________

__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 08:17 AM   #13
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 231
Country: United States
40 inch is good, but a 52 inch wouldn't burn that much more juice. This will be one area where I spend some cash, is on a decent TV. Everything else will be as efficient as possible, but I want a good TV for watching movies on. Just waiting for the Sharp 52 incher I want to go below 1000 bucks.
Telco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 04:21 PM   #14
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
realistically that will probably happen in 9-10 months.

i was looking to get a 32in tv for 1g in january, but i held out and procrastinated on doing solid research. now i can get a 40in tv of much higher quality for 1g... its ridiculous how much prices have been dropping recently.
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 06:07 AM   #15
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 49
Country: United States
Energy consumption of TVs:
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6475_7-6400401-3.html
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0616/p13s02-stct.html
WisJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 07:01 AM   #16
Registered Member
 
jwxr7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 291
Country: United States
I'm trying to conserve electricity even more now. I bought a clothesline and dried a load outside yesterday. Conditions were great for it and I think it was just as fast if not faster than my electric dryer . I would like to do at least one load a week outside (we do 2-3 loads a week). Just gotta keep the japanese beetles off things.
__________________
Best tank= 81.23 mpg on july 1st 2008
SAVE SOME GAS, SAVE THE WORLD!

jwxr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 07:12 AM   #17
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
Nice find Jim.

From the CSM: "One 50-inch plasma high-definition TV (HDTV) was estimated to use 679 kilowatt-hours of electricity per year. A 32-inch liquid-crystal display with HDTV capability was pegged at 387 kWh per year. By contrast, an older analog 34-inch TV was estimated to use just 209 kWh per year, NRDC tests found."

Looks like I got the part about CRTs totally wrong! The Cnet review is very enlightening however. Obviously there are huge dispartities in how much a TV uses while on and off. Seems to me that a person would be well advised to bring a watt meter along while shopping.
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2007, 07:21 AM   #18
Registered Member
 
Mentalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 121
Country: United States
Last week our clothes washer died. It was an old Maytag that we were not really happy with how well it had worked anyway. So its a good reason to ditch it. After a bit of research I went and bought a Fisher & Paykel model that should use less than half the electricity, about half the water, and spin drys at 1000rpm for darn near dry clothes before using the dryer to finish drying and get rid of the wrinkles.
So far we really like it and it washes way better than what we had. I really like the fact that you can re-program the wash cycles a good bit to work the way YOU want it to, and even save your settings. It definitely is taking much less time in the dryer as well so were saving there too.
Its a funny sounding machine, first time it did the 1000rpm spin I though the mother ship had landed in the utility room! Its not loud, we just had the door open on the utility room.
__________________
Mentalic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2007, 07:29 AM   #19
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
That's a front loader too isn't it?

It irks me that most of the emphasis on the energy efficient washers centers around them being front loading when the reality is that spin speed is probably the most important factor to saving energy. Sure, a front loader may save several gallons of hot water, but my dryer running for 20-30 minutes vs. 40-60 would certainly save allot more.

I've read nothing but good stuff about the F&P stuff FWIW.
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2007, 07:46 AM   #20
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
The front loader is more efficient at what it does, using less energy and water, and a closeline can reduce drying energy costs significantly.
__________________

__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looks like the price you entered for a litre of gas is unrealistic. winstona Fuelly Web Support and Community News 6 05-12-2013 11:26 AM
Fuelly Android App - eehokie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-14-2010 09:59 PM
Gaslog suggestion SVOboy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 1 04-29-2006 09:35 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.