OT car design peeves: integrated signal/headlights & inboard signals - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > The Pub > General Discussion (Off-Topic)
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-06-2007, 09:30 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
OT car design peeves: integrated signal/headlights & inboard signals

Peeve #1: current styling (and possibly bean counting) over functionality & safety has many manufacturers integrating the turn signal and headlight into a single unit.

Isn't it obvious that physically separating the two light sources increases visibility of the turn signal through greater contrast? And thus safety? Duh.

Guilty:




Peeve #2: (somewhat related). Manufacturers who place the front turn signals inboard of the headlight. Ford comes to mind as particularly guilty of this mistake.

Makes it impossible to see signals in a "line" of approaching traffic until either you or the approaching car are close enough (too close) that there's an unobstructed sight line to the signal light.

VERY Guilty:

__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:31 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
La, la, la. I like to complain.

The Blackfly is guilty on both counts.
__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 12:31 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
bzipitidoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 112
Country: United States
it's a conspiracy!

I like cheap, when it's cheap for all concerned. That is, cheaper to make and run and maintain and clean up after. But so many times it's cheap to make and expensive to run and maintain, like incandescent lights. Steel rims are like that too, but there the picture isn't so clear. Like, steel rims are much more forgiving of damage. Then there's the conspiracy thought: those headlight covers are unique to each car model, and much more profitable for the replacement parts biz when yours catches a rock and has to be replaced.

The govt sticks us with some dubious tradeoffs. In the 70s and 80s, we had lousy emissions controls-- the EGR valve, and the air pump and charcoal cannisters. Today the safety standards are such that it's impossible to make a light car that is strong enough to pass. I read somewhere that the Metro cannot pass current US safety standards. I've noticed some states have high "safety" standards that just happen to generate lots of business for certain industries. Like, Virginia is so picky about cracks in the windshield they might as well just say "no cracks allowed at all" instead of their more complicated criteria that makes it sound like they're not so tough. When I asked why, they claimed it was for safety. The silver lining is that windshields are a bit cheaper in VA thanks to the economies of scale and competition VA's rules cause. VA also hassled me about side marker lights. They had to work. Didn't matter that many cars don't even have such lights. If your car has them, they must work. CA by constrast didn't care about a windshield crack or two and side marker lights, as long as your car met their legendary emissions standards. And TX, well... if you're not near a big city, TX is easy.
bzipitidoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 06:16 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Fender-Mounted Signals

I thought of the Sable even before the post -- definitely way inboard.

With as much driving as we do on multi-lane highways in the 'States, you would think a side-marker signal on the fender would be required (as in Europe, Japan, etc).



If you're merging on the highway, it's hard to tell another driver is taking the same lane, otherwise. A few cars have it -- seems to be popular to place it in the mirror.

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 08:06 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 77
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, OH
Send a message via ICQ to occupant Send a message via AIM to occupant Send a message via Yahoo to occupant
Moose has turn signals up front that are entirely surrounded by grille shell. But there are side markers that blink with the signals, although they are ahead of the front wheel arches.

My Celebrity has turn signals mounted IN the bumper, and the side markers blink with them. However the rear turn signals are completely invisible from a side view.

The Sable you posted has the same setup. The marker lenses in the bumper cover sides are SUPPOSED to blink with the signals. Then again most people just think they're reflectors.
occupant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly badge not updating for about 2 - 3 weeks Need Fuelly Web Support and Community News 18 07-01-2012 03:01 PM
Fuelly Android App - eehokie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-14-2010 09:59 PM
VW Jetta fast riser coolbreeze General Fuel Topics 5 07-22-2009 12:25 AM
Condensator orevgym General Fuel Topics 0 07-23-2006 11:25 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.