Trump and the Auto Industry - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > The Pub > General Discussion (Off-Topic)
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-24-2017, 11:55 AM   #21
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: IL/AR
Posts: 76
Country: United States
The only casualty from the death of the TPP: fuel efficient and practical imported small trucks.

The Death Of The TPP Means You Can Kiss Your Imported Small Truck Dreams Goodbye
__________________

__________________
cuts_off_prius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 08:15 AM   #22
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,385
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
Not everyone in Europe hates Trump, watch this!

https://youtu.be/j-xxis7hDOE
__________________

__________________



Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2017, 08:51 AM   #23
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Country: United States
hahahaha They did a GREAT job impersonating Trump's speaking pattern.

Knowing how you feel about Trump, Paul, I suspected something fishy.
ChewChewTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 06:00 PM   #24
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: IL/AR
Posts: 76
Country: United States
Executive Orders Coming to EPA, but Will Automakers Get Their Wish?

Stay tuned.

Interesting discussions they're having down in the comments section. What I love about reading TTAC.

Also this update. The guy who tried to sue the EPA like 14 times is now the head of the EPA.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...nate-head-epa/
__________________
cuts_off_prius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 04:34 AM   #25
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,264
Country: United States
Location: up nawth
I remember when Pop went to a new Air Force base to start the process of computerizing payroll operations, back when the US debt was maybe half a trillion dollars, 1/40th of what it is now.

The people at that base were scared that they would loose their jobs and they tried everything to get dirt on Pop, thinking if they could bribe him or get him fired, was the solution to the inevitable automation they and millions of others faced over the next 4-5 decades.

They even hired hookers to pick him up at a bar and videotape the "compromising" actions they were sure he would take when faced with such temptation.

Now those workers, at least the ones that really looked to the future, are some of the highest paid IT specialists, operators, and systems analysts with great job security and benefits the rest of us could only dream of having.
__________________
R.I.D.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 04:48 AM   #26
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,264
Country: United States
Location: up nawth
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuts_off_prius View Post
Executive Orders Coming to EPA, but Will Automakers Get Their Wish?

Stay tuned.

Interesting discussions they're having down in the comments section. What I love about reading TTAC.

Also this update. The guy who tried to sue the EPA like 14 times is now the head of the EPA.

Scott Pruitt Confirmed by Senate to Head EPA
I once asked my brother to give me a referral for an attorney to prosecute a breach of contract case. He told me to hire this attorney, the one that had sued his company 4 times and won 3 of the four suits.
__________________
R.I.D.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 08:17 AM   #27
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draigflag View Post
Wondered how long before we saw something about Trump on here. The bloke is going to be an absolute disaster, and we thought Brexit was a bad idea. I just don't get how someone with his level of naivety, arrogance, and lack of experience gets elected, besides all the hatred he's been spreading about various sexes, religions, races etc, really baffles me.

But apart from all that, he believes climate change is a "hoax" despite billions being spent on scientific research that has proven the opposite for the last 30 years or so. He wants to rip the solar panels off the white house, drop out the Paris climate change treaty, and start drilling for oil again. He will be a complete environmental disaster. Also, if he actually goes ahead and bans 1.6 billion people for thier religious beliefs, I vow never to step on US soil whilst he's in office. Good luck.
It's odd to assert that "we thought Brexit was a bad idea" when your form of representative government approved it, and to assert that Trump is naive and arrogant whilst simultaneously misunderstanding american policy.

People in the US buy cars that fit their needs and desires. The federal policy that made cars smaller and more fuel efficient just pushed affluent people into trucks. In my morning commute, "Mini"vans (what's "mini" about a two ton Honda with a 270hp engine?) and SUVs easily outnumber cars. Lots of families have two or three of these trucks, and not a single car.

I don't believe you would see average fuel efficiency decrease in the US if the EPA scraped its mileage floors, though you might see larger cars marketed to people who now buy trucks.
frugalkoenig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 08:29 AM   #28
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.I.D.E. View Post
I remember when Pop went to a new Air Force base to start the process of computerizing payroll operations, back when the US debt was maybe half a trillion dollars, 1/40th of what it is now.
In other words, the US National Debt was 1/40th of what it is today until Gary's Dad was hired to computerize the federal payroll.

DAMN, I'M FUNNY!
ChewChewTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 05:02 PM   #29
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: IL/AR
Posts: 76
Country: United States
Automakers Didn't Waste a Day Asking New EPA Head for Relief

CAFE is stupid anyway, because it's largely based on vehicle footprint (i.e. longer wheelbase, more lax efficiency targets and vice versa). I'll save that for a separate thread
__________________
cuts_off_prius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 05:57 PM   #30
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuts_off_prius View Post
Automakers Didn't Waste a Day Asking New EPA Head for Relief

CAFE is stupid anyway, because it's largely based on vehicle footprint (i.e. longer wheelbase, more lax efficiency targets and vice versa). I'll save that for a separate thread
Whether or not Trump relaxes the CAFE rules doesn't really matter at this time. EVs have established a beachhead and will only become more popular as battery tech improves yearly.

If Trump is wise, he'll play his "card" by appeasing the car companies knowing that, in the long game, it really doesn't matter.

The USA car companies are repeating history. GM won their California CAFE battle and used that victory to crush their EV1 project in 1999. Meanwhile, Toyota rolled with the CAFE rule punches and produced the first Prius in 1997. Gee. The Prius has been in production for 20 years?
__________________

ChewChewTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.