what are your 2006 fuel economy goals? - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > The Pub > General Discussion (Off-Topic)
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-24-2006, 02:40 PM   #11
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Don't be silly matt, we're

Don't be silly matt, we're talking about wideband controllers for tuning,
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2006, 03:37 PM   #12
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 48
Country: United States
I dont have a fuel economy

I dont have a fuel economy goal for 2006. of course more MPG is always welcome if performance of my car is not decreased.
In fact i will probably spend much more money in order to make some consumption tests and modifications.

Nowadays i am plannig to obtain an ODBII interface and a PDA computer in order to log the consumption and engine data all the time..
And at summer i will try to completely cover underfloor of the car.
And June will be the month when i will begin trying to apply some serious modifications and tests.. Before summer i am planning and obtaining data and ideas from internet web pages and forums (like gassavers.org )
__________________

Capcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 07:59 AM   #13
Moderator
 
GasSavers_DaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,209
Country: United States
Re: I've seen used widebands go

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
I've seen used widebands go for 150, and you can just turn around and sell them or tune for others, not much loss if you wanna work for it,
I'm thinking of investing in a good one, so that I can also tune my turbocharged motor when I get it back up and running. And yes Matt, I'm talking about a controller, not the actual sensor.
GasSavers_DaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 01:00 PM   #14
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Of the the new innovate

Of the the new innovate lm-1s is perfectly good, just doesn't have a fancy *** display with it,
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 08:52 AM   #15
Moderator
 
GasSavers_DaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,209
Country: United States
I personally wouldn't buy

I personally wouldn't buy either Tech Edge or Innovative, as I have had friends that have had serious problems with both. I've heard nothing but praise from PLX, plus I'm willing to pay the difference. Does the Innovative still only use the NTK sensor? One benefit of the PLX is that it uses the much less expensive Bosch sensor.
GasSavers_DaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 02:40 PM   #16
FE nut
 
diamondlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,020
Country: United States
There are a few things in

There are a few things in the works that, if they work as planned, I think my mileage could easily be in the 50's for combined city/highway and 60's or way above for straight highway. I wish I could share more details but I don't want to jeapordize my chances at this year's Tour de Sol.
__________________
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall, torque is how much of the wall you take with you.

2007 Prius,



Team Slow Burn
diamondlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 07:58 PM   #17
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 71
Country: United States
i figure since my best fuel

i figure since my best fuel mileage ever occured in jan, last couple of weeks, i've already achieve my un-stated goal! But seriously, runnning a full tank and achieving 25mpg's would probably make my year, in mpg terms at least
chesspirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 08:45 PM   #18
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
50 mpg

My goal is 50 miles per gallon highway. I know it's doable because I'm installing enough this year to easily beat that. I just want my goals to be obtainable.

Oh, I also want to finish my n600. and cruise around in it this summer :P
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 12:53 AM   #19
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Re: There are a few things in

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondlarry
There are a few things in the works that, if they work as planned, I think my mileage could easily be in the 50's for combined city/highway and 60's or way above for straight highway. I wish I could share more details but I don't want to jeapordize my chances at this year's Tour de Sol.
They are no secret. I can tell you all the stuff to make my gas hog get 60mpg hwy. Remove seats except mine, spare, jack, tools. Pump up tires to 45 psi. Get a clean air filter, do the whole underbody of the car and go 55 mph. Don't forget the fuel heater, tricking the air intake sensor and playing with timing.

But I think you have some more stuff I haven't thought about. I've been doing some experimental stuff and I have found out the brakes do in fact work while the car is off and so does the automatic transmission. It shifts as if the engine is pushing it but the engine is off. SO far I have done this 3 times and they were okay. Since I have a auto I only do it in areas that I know well and when I know i'm going to park my car for a while. For instance I went to my cousin's house and since there were no cars I turned the motor off like 1/4 mile from his house. The car rolled in D with the engine off all the way to his house, I even parked it. Same thing with my other cousin we turned the engine off 1/4 mile from his house and rolled it down a street turned left and parked it next to his house. Having no powersteer is ok. It feels only a little bit harder.
__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 02:07 AM   #20
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
DiamondLarry is working on

DiamondLarry is working on some radical engine/car modifications to get his proposed MPG figures, much above an underbody addition or weight reduction.

Some of the mods you mentioned Compaq will shorten the life of your engine. Screwing with timing and your o2 sensor is kind of an exact science, one that will hurt your engine if you don't do it right. Hell, we could get any 4 cylinder engine to get 100mpg if we ran it lean enough. Then again we could probably only use the engine once in this condition.

As for running your car with the ignition off, I'd do a little reading on your transmission before you do this again. MOST (not all) automatics should not be run with the ignition turned off. It will destroy your transmission faster than anything else. You'd be much better off putting it in neutral than turning your engine off.
__________________

Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incorrect Milage Calcuatlion PatM Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 07-17-2009 07:21 PM
Missing Fuelup jmonty Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 05-27-2009 04:10 AM
Pulse and Glide? Pete7874 General Fuel Topics 24 02-26-2009 11:11 AM
All Licensed Drivers terrapin Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 08-07-2008 09:49 AM
"active" aero grille slats on 06 civic concept MetroMPG General Fuel Topics 21 01-03-2006 12:02 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.