Why don't we see more SUVs in the GasSavers garage? - Page 5 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > The Pub > General Discussion (Off-Topic)
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-19-2007, 09:23 AM   #41
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 409
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
ah yes, getting out of the ditch in the snow... the first time the roads here got a bit of snow I had to go out of town, and I saw 15 or so SUV's in the ditch, and one car... from my experince driving SUV's a small front wheel drive car gets better traction and is more stable, same thing goes for shear safty, from all the articals I've read on numbers of people killed by differnt kinds of vehicles, if I had kids I would be more likely to tell them to take candy from strangers then to ride in an SUV.

They're only 15% more likely to kill their occupants than the average family sedan
__________________

__________________
red91sit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 11:42 AM   #42
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
It's something of a cultural confound. If someone has the cash to want and afford an SUV, they're probably willing to spend more on gas too. So, the people who get the small efficient cars, will want to get the most out of them, but unfortunately, save less gas by driving efficiently compared to those with more inefficient cars And they drive those beasts because they don't care about saving gas/money in the first place. Diminishing returns I suppose.
__________________

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 12:45 PM   #43
kps
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 61
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELF View Post
its pretty discouraging when you try really hard and your mpg goes from 12 to 14.
It shouldn't be. Miles/gallon is a somewhat counterintuitive unit, since it's inverse to what people generally care about, which is how much fuel is used.

Suppose someone drives 10000 miles.
* Going from 12mpg to 14mpg (2mpg improvement) saves 120 gallons.
* Going from 24mpg to 28mpg (4mpg improvement) saves 60 gallons.
* Going from 36mpg to 42mpg (6mpg improvement) saves 40 gallons.
If you start with a compact at 36mpg and want to save the same 120 gallons over 10000 miles, you need to hit 63mpg.
kps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 01:02 PM   #44
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by kps View Post
...
If you start with a compact at 36mpg and want to save the same 120 gallons over 10000 miles, you need to hit 63mpg.
I came up with 84mpg?
__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 01:17 PM   #45
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
Lets just say a lot more.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 02:41 PM   #46
Registered Member
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 467
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by kps View Post
Suppose someone drives 10000 miles.
* Going from 12mpg to 14mpg (2mpg improvement) saves 120 gallons.
* Going from 24mpg to 28mpg (4mpg improvement) saves 60 gallons.
* Going from 36mpg to 42mpg (6mpg improvement) saves 40 gallons.
Holy! Now THAT puts it into perspective! (BTW, I've driven 17,400 miles in my Geo since I bought it... and that was only 6 months ago!)
Peakster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 03:04 PM   #47
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
It actually does look more obvious if you invert the units, for this example lets convert the MPGs to gallons/10000miles (just divide 10000 by the mpg number):


* Going from 833g/10kmi to 714g/10kmi (2mpg improvement) saves ~120 gallons.
* Going from 417g/10kmi to 357g/10kmi (4mpg improvement) saves ~60 gallons.
* Going from 278g/10kmi (36mpg) to 238g/10kmi (6mpg improvement) saves ~40 gallons.

Since we have a common denominator, life is easy. 278g-120g = 158g, 10000/158 = 63mpg. Where did I get 84mpg from?!?
__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 04:52 PM   #48
Tuggin at the surly bonds
 
Silveredwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 839
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by skewbe View Post
It actually does look more obvious if you invert the units, for this example lets convert the MPGs to gallons/10000miles (just divide 10000 by the mpg number):


* Going from 833g/10kmi to 714g/10kmi (2mpg improvement) saves ~120 gallons.
* Going from 417g/10kmi to 357g/10kmi (4mpg improvement) saves ~60 gallons.
* Going from 278g/10kmi (36mpg) to 238g/10kmi (6mpg improvement) saves ~40 gallons.

Since we have a common denominator, life is easy. 278g-120g = 158g, 10000/158 = 63mpg. Where did I get 84mpg from?!?
It must've been a diesel.
__________________
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. - Albert Einstein
Silveredwings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 06:30 PM   #49
ELF
Registered Member
 
ELF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 245
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by kps View Post
It shouldn't be. Miles/gallon is a somewhat counterintuitive unit, since it's inverse to what people generally care about, which is how much fuel is used.

Suppose someone drives 10000 miles.
* Going from 12mpg to 14mpg (2mpg improvement) saves 120 gallons.
* Going from 24mpg to 28mpg (4mpg improvement) saves 60 gallons.
* Going from 36mpg to 42mpg (6mpg improvement) saves 40 gallons.
If you start with a compact at 36mpg and want to save the same 120 gallons over 10000 miles, you need to hit 63mpg.
This is great! I was saving more gallons of gas driving my truck
guess I will have to start driving it again

Lets see 10k in my truck = 769 gallons @ 13mpg
10k in my car = 384 gallons @ 26mpg

Total gallons of gas saved by parking my truck and driving the car =385

I am not trying to discourage anyone here, I am happy to hear about any person who tries to save gas, no matter what they drive.
__________________
ELF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 01:40 PM   #50
FE nut
 
diamondlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,020
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELF View Post
I am not trying to discourage anyone here, I am happy to hear about any person who tries to save gas, no matter what they drive.
DITTO with a capital D!
__________________

__________________
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall, torque is how much of the wall you take with you.

2007 Prius,



Team Slow Burn
diamondlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CSV import problem. MNellis Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 02-14-2011 07:14 AM
More graphs? jonsands Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 07-08-2009 01:54 AM
How I made my ****ty auto torque converter lock up without an auto ecu SVOboy Transmissions and Running Gear 17 03-29-2006 06:54 PM
Seriously Considering an Import (Literally) rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 5 03-24-2006 09:18 PM
Bug with signature lines fixed Matt Timion Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 11-15-2005 11:49 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.