2006-2007 Chevy Malibu - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > News and Articles > Car Reviews
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-24-2007, 07:25 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
2006-2007 Chevy Malibu

That's right, you read the title correctly. Best of Brand? The Malibu line doesn't meet the criteria to live up to Camry mileage and reliability, but this Chevy deserves an award for a variety of reasons, and tops all of the GM line in innovation and economy. Since I first drove this car as a VERY welcomed replacement to the fleet-only Chevy Classic (previous generation Malibu), it was evident that this car was designed and implemented very differently.





What makes the Malibu a stand-out is its ability to use a variety of features together as an efficient vehicle, but still simple to operate. Electric power steering, push-button gear selector when in Drive, tilting and telescoping wheel, plenty of torque and mid-RPM power, and better-than-expected fuel economy add up to a nice surprise. Cargo capacity is expanded as the back seats fold flat, as does the front passenger seat. If the Malibu Maxx is selected, a longer wheelbase and a wagon-like hatchback offers rear seats that move on tracks like typical front seats to offer more space for hauling, or additional legroom (which is good in either model). Optional On-Star and XM Radio are built-into the top-tier 2LT and SS trim levels in the sedan.

The fuel economy in both the 4-cylinder and V6 consistently get better than the EPA estimates in all categories. With the torque of the V6, the vehicle feels faster than 0-60 and other published track times suggest. Controls are easy to reach and the typical sedan layout makes blind-spots minimal. The bottom line is that any new Malibu I drive, I can count on better-than-average fuel economy in a variety of speeds and conditions.

On the flip-side, the drive isn't exciting, and expected reliability isn't up to Asian makes. The transmission downshifts to 1st very oddly in Neutral, or to N from 1st (even when engine-off coasting). For example, coasting down a hill from third gear, pop it in Neutral, and coast to a stop at a traffic light. From 2nd to 1st, engine off or on, there's a hard thump and vibration, like the clutch isn't fully engaged. Just a guess, but maybe the clutch is reduced because shifting from R to D when the car is still moving is much like driving a manual -- it's an odd fault in the transmission.

The Malibu is the first of many vehicle to be built on this platform around the world. In North America, expect to see the Pontiac G6 as a badge-sharing vehicle (but of significantly less build quality and design). US Automakers and GM itself needs to take notes as to how this car was designed, and to take it as an excellent example of what folks are looking for. It's an inexpensive, domestic sedan that makes no compromises and gets tremendous fuel economy. If I'm buying the gas and taking a long trip with a rental, the Malibu is at the top of the list to choose for comfort, ease of use, and great FE every time.

Choose the 4-cylinder for less torque, better in-town FE, and a lighter foot. The V6 is the most popular and has neck snapping mid-range kick and excellent high-speed Interstate economy. All this, and it's made in my hometown of Kansas City at the Fairfax Assembly Plant. I'm usually hard on GM, but this car has earned my trust on many levels. In addition, many safety features are standard such as: excellent crash-test ratings, ABS with brakeforce distribution, front/rear head airbags, traction control, and many others.

+ Fuel Economy
+ Overall Comfort and ease of use
+ Functionality and Cargo Hauling

- Average Styling in-and-out
- Funky Transmission
- Expected Reliability

2006 Chevrolet Malibu
Trim Level: 2LT V6
EPA Vehicle Class: Midsize Car
Engine: Pushrod 3.5L V-6 rated at 217 hp / 217 ft-lb torque
Transmission: 4-Speed Automatic with torque converter and "Manumatic" shift button
EPA Mileage Estimates (City/Highway/Combined Cycle): 22/32/26
Avg. Speed: 62 MPH
Time = 9.2 hours
Miles = 578
Weather Conditions over 2-days: Fair. Temp range 60-90F
Driving Style: Average
Location Test: Tulsa Metro to Kansas City and Metro Areas

MPG = 31.8
__________________

__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2007, 08:36 AM   #2
Semi-retired OPEC Buster
 
BeeUU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
Country: United States
Thumbs up Malibu.....

I would like to add to rh77 review with the following:

What a surprise was this car. It was a rental for the weekend. It had the 2.2 liter 4 cylinder and the 4 speed automatic. I intended to rent a Cobalt, but when I arrived at the lot to pick up the car, the only Cobalt on the lot had tires of three different conditions, two different brands. The worst tire (nearly bald-worn uneven) was on the front opposite a completely brand new tire of a different brand. Needless to say the car was rejected.

So the car to the right was a Malibu, with only 550 miles on the clock!!!!

The car was driven from Seattle to Whistler B.C., returned 33 mpg with an average speed of 47 mph, according to the in-car display. Rain and less than 50 degrees for most of the trip.

Impressions:
The transmission will hold high gear for a long time, you have to press deeply into the throttle before the downshift to start. This is great when trying to squeeze out better mileage.

Nice interior, the biggest surprise was the tilt/telescope steering wheel. So nice to have, biggest improvement in a GM car ever!! There were some of the typical GM plastic mold edges here and there, but generally is was a pleasant place to be and looked good too.

If you can maintain 60 mph, the car will get an indicated 38 mpg. When traveling 70-80 it seems to get in the low 30s. Impressive.

The suspension settings seemed to be some-what firm and well damped. I never had to push the car, mostly cruising down the freeway and up the hills on the way to Whistler, typically behind slow traffic, but it felt composed and capable. Better than all previous GM efforts I have driven, bar the Cadillac CTS.

The electric steering is a strange bird. I guess for most people it works well enough, but it is completely devoid of feel and the effort seems to change as you are spinning the wheel. At least is weights up nicely as speed builds and contributes to the decent mileage.

The engine did not have a great sound when wound up, but again most of the time you will never know.

This engine must work well when in the lighter Cobalt.

Would actually consider buying this car if it had a 5-speed.

Overall this was car leaves me with a good impression. Just dont look at the nose.....
__________________
B W


BeeUU is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Get Quench out of the banner SVOboy Fuelly Web Support and Community News 13 10-17-2006 12:07 AM
Is Instrumentation Important? Compaq888 General Fuel Topics 45 08-05-2006 05:30 AM
My brakes go "dragga dragga dragga" SVOboy General Fuel Topics 17 08-03-2006 08:50 AM
Some wire tuck advice please? SVOboy General Maintenance and Repair 5 08-02-2006 05:30 PM
A Giblet of Friendly Advice SVOboy General Maintenance and Repair 12 08-02-2006 11:35 AM

» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.