Biggest overachievers and underachievers in real world highway MPG - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > News and Articles > Car Reviews
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-04-2016, 11:19 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: IL/AR
Posts: 76
Country: United States
Biggest overachievers and underachievers in real world highway MPG

Car and Driver tested 100 cars for their real world highway MPG by doing a 200 mile loop of Michigan's I-94 maintaining 75 mph (120 km/h). Here are the results ranked by percent difference between real world and EPA numbers (slide show format):

The Biggest Overachievers in Our Real-World Highway MPG Test

The Biggest Underachievers in Our Real-World Highway MPG Test

Interesting to see mostly trucks and SUVs for the underachievers. Could it be that the testers had more offroad accessories and the EPA ratings are from base models with, say, lower rolling resistance tires?

Note how MPG isn't linear - The BMW 330i EPA rating was 34 MPG highway, but achieved 41 MPG real world (+ 7 MPG; 21 % difference) while the Maserati Levante is rated at 19 MPG highway and achieved 24 MPG real world (+5 MPG; 26% difference).
__________________

__________________
cuts_off_prius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2016, 05:09 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,594
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
The EPA highway test has a top speed of 60mph, and the high speed cycle is 80mph.
But the average speeds for both tests is under 50mph.

Trucks have horrible aerodynamics, and that is going to hurt them more when looking at fuel economy at higher speeds.
__________________

trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2016, 10:43 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,742
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
Not huge differences there, in the MPG Marathon this year, the V8 Mustang got a 75% improvement over it's "already over-rated" NEDC figures, although this was hypermiling, probably no considered "real World" enough for the average user.

Why the gasoline bias? No doubt some of the diesels would have trumped all of those shown. Shame. Still seems kind of odd praising cars that still have low MPG figures in this day and age though.
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2016, 01:57 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,594
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
It's an American publication. There are very few diesel choices among cars here; even before VW was caught cheating. Most of the diesel trucks sold don't have an official fuel economy score.

As a percentage of total new car sales, it appears that plug ins have surpassed diesels here.
trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2016, 02:13 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,742
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
Ok well just for good measure, here are some UK findings, best real world MPG for various categories including small cars, SUV'S, 4 wheel drives, family cars etc. Plenty in there getting 60-70 MPG too.

Real-world MPG: Britain's most economical cars - What Car?
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 03:17 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 165
Country: Canada
Location: Halifax
It looks like a number of Porches are doing a lot better in the real World than reported by the manufacturer. The rumor is that since they are owned by VW, and they don't want any more trouble with the EPA, they are very conservative with their fuel mileage for the new cars. Hyundai had to send monthly gas cheques to owners because they advertised larger mpg's than it was possible and pissed off a lot of people. Better be safe than sorry.
luv2spd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 11:11 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,742
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
You often find it's the sportier cars get close to their ratings. This is mainly because they are "Sports" cars, so many don't have the functions that normal cars do, such as stop start etc, which boost the numbers in the test cycles. The same can be said for older cars, and basic cars, the gap between the test cycle and the real world has increased here from about 10% to over 25% in the last decade or so.

Also, Sports cars are very low, aerodynamic etc, what makes them cut through the air to make the quicker also helps fuel economy.
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2016, 06:57 AM   #8
LDB
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Houston suburb
Posts: 423
Country: United States
Location: Houston suburb
It would be nice if C&D gave the article with actual numbers and not just a few photos.
__________________
2018 Accord Hybrid Champagne/Ivory

LDB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2016, 05:52 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Country: United States
Location: Wisconsin
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDB View Post
It would be nice if C&D gave the article with actual numbers and not just a few photos.
Welcome to the new internet. Lots of pictures and little content all formatted to work on mobile devices.
__________________
Matt715 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2016, 11:03 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,742
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDB View Post
It would be nice if C&D gave the article with actual numbers and not just a few photos.
Maybe you're getting the mobile site, as underneath each picture is a brief description with quoted EPA numbers and the real world figures achieved too, at least that's what I can see.
__________________

Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Fuelly iOS Apps
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.