Kia Niro Hybrid instrumented test - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-18-2017, 06:23 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: IL/AR
Posts: 74
Country: United States
Kia Niro Hybrid instrumented test

2017 Kia Niro Test | Review | Car and Driver

Kia's new smallish crossover hybrid comes with three trims.

Quote:
One Vehicle, Three Fuel-Economy Ratings

The Niro wears one of three different EPA labels depending on the trim level. The FE model (for Fuel Efficient) is the most frugal at 50 mpg combined, while the Niro Touring registers 43 mpg. The midrange LX and EX trims both carry a 49-mpg combined rating.
I was going to type some more but honestly I'm already bored out of my mind from the mention of "hybrid" and "crossover" in the same sentence. It's good for what it does. At least it's on the smaller side, kind of a step in the right direction with a crossover-obsessed public. Don't know of any crossovers (in our market) that are as efficient as this one, besides the Tesla.
__________________

__________________
cuts_off_prius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2017, 12:13 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,467
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
Disappointing real World MPG for a hybrid in my opinion. They should have mated it to one of their strong little diesels engines, they would have 60 MPG as a starting point.

The 22 Niro's on Fuelly are only getting 43.3 and 45.7 US MPG average, it's not that big a car when you actually look at it, aerodynamics should be better than a full size SUV.
__________________

__________________

Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2017, 06:12 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,454
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
The problem with diesel hybrids is price. Hard enough here convincing people to pay extra for one or the other. With both having good low end torque, diesels and electric motors also don't have the synergy of motors with gasoline. Which means the gains aren't likely to be as great.

Depending on the mix of trims, the 43.3 to 45.7 can actually be good. I expect more midrange trims to sell than the higher MPG base one. Something else to keep in mind with the Niro and Ioniq, only North America has gotten all the efficiency tricks. European models still have the 12 volt battery for example.
trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2017, 12:08 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Country: Canada
Location: Burnaby BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draigflag View Post
Disappointing real World MPG for a hybrid in my opinion. They should have mated it to one of their strong little diesels engines, they would have 60 MPG as a starting point.

The 22 Niro's on Fuelly are only getting 43.3 and 45.7 US MPG average, it's not that big a car when you actually look at it, aerodynamics should be better than a full size SUV.
Strong little diesel engines are few and far between in North America. I have rented turbo diesel Astra Tiquan and Megans in Europe over the past few years with 6 spds.

My first tank on my Niro, SX touring resulted in 5.1 L per 100 km or 55 mpg Imp. By choosing a lower model with smaller tyres no spare tire etc 60 mpg could be easily obtained.

The Niro is up to and better than the Vauxhall, VW and Renault re equipment.

Certainly quieter than a diesel.

My other car is a Miata ( MX5)
c2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.