Full Throttle at low RPM, or High RPM and low throttle - Page 5 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Hypermiling
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-07-2010, 01:41 PM   #41
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,442
Country: United States
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
This gets into the big engine small engine problem. I have a friend with a 2.5L v6 in his Sennica and see really poor MPG readings until he gets into a higher gear with his automatic at about 40mph where as in my 1.5L xB I get really high MPG readings lugging it at idle in 5th gear at 20mph like 70mpg on the level road.
__________________

JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 08:58 AM   #42
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 427
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
If you're going faster, you're doing it wrong. You may not gain a fuel economy improvement; you may in fact lose fuel economy.

I often shift when I've only reached 1200RPM. You may need to go lower than that. The strategy may not be compatible with your car. Experimentation will answer all of these questions for sure.
what is 1200 to holy cow is 1600 or so for me
__________________

spotaneagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 08:40 AM   #43
Registered Member
 
guest001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 198
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo View Post
At low rpm it doesn't take much throttle to drop vacuum to near 0 on the intake since even a small throttle opening allows more air to flow into the engine than it can pump so you really are not doing much by pushing the pedal further other than feeding the ECU with throttle position signals that may richen the mixture even further and push yourself into open loop.

This is correct. I have a vacuum/boost gauge in my car and I can see the vacuum per throttle angle. u can get to 0 vac. without opening the throttle all the way.

on a map of maf the throttle angle isn't used for fuel enrichment unless the throttle body is open x amount in x amount of time. quick acceleration needs more fuel (in theory). if your moving steady its not even going to do anything. rpm's increasing is going to add more fuel. but like said, at 0 vacuum your at a higher efficiency.

I wanted to add you can get to 0 without going into open loop as I've seen it on my vacuum gauge. also how the tps.

a vacuum gauge is great for exactly this cause I know exactly how much throttle to use to get to 0. you can also see lugging, the needle shakes.
guest001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 12:44 AM   #44
Registered Member
 
fowljesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 188
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
If you're going faster, you're doing it wrong. You may not gain a fuel economy improvement; you may in fact lose fuel economy.

I often shift when I've only reached 1200RPM. You may need to go lower than that. The strategy may not be compatible with your car. Experimentation will answer all of these questions for sure.
By faster, I meant accelleration. What you described is how I drive normally because of how the car is set up. It's very hard to drive it normally. It's lloking promising. I'll see after this tank is done.
fowljesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 05:36 AM   #45
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Yup, that's what I was talking about too. I don't accelerate any faster than the traffic around me. If you can't control your acceleration enough by shifting because you have too much idle-RPM torque, it won't work for you.

Even if you can, it still may not be the most efficient way to drive your car...it sure is for mine, though.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 12:31 PM   #46
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Country: United States
Isn't lugging an engine damaging to the rod and main bearings?
Ilikebmx999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 12:48 PM   #47
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Lugging will destroy the engine quickly. Modern engines are equipped with knock sensors and can't lug. They run or they stall. At very low RPM with wide throttle openings they may rumble or growl; the extra vibrations may prematurely wear stuff. I avoid letting that happen.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 03:06 PM   #48
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Country: United States
I would think 75% throttle at such a low rpm would just be hammering the bearings constantly. The engine is attempting to spin faster but cannot due to the resistance of moving the car forward so as the combustion happens it's forcing the pistons/rods down but they cannot move so the force would be put on the rod and main bearings.

That's my thoughts on it but I have nothing to back it up.
Ilikebmx999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 04:00 PM   #49
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
At such a low RPM, there just isn't much power being made. There's so much more torque at higher RPM that the lower RPM can't even begin to stress that stuff.

Basically, the difference between 50% throttle and 100% throttle at, say, 1000RPM, is merely the energy wasted sucking air through the throttle...it's not making much more power, pulling in much more air, or using much more fuel.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 05:01 PM   #50
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Country: United States
Unfortunately I can't even use that technique....oh well. Thanks for the explanation.
__________________

Ilikebmx999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly Android App - eehokie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-14-2010 09:59 PM
Chart suggestions jeadly Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 08-08-2008 03:46 AM
Landspeeds E-bike Conversion (Mk2) landspeed People Powered 5 06-06-2008 08:37 PM
How does Automatic Tranny choose? GeekGuyAndy Transmissions and Running Gear 5 08-13-2007 05:05 AM
ElectroCharger assist motor to retro-fit any car into a hybrid Matt Timion Hybrid Vehicles 2 10-09-2005 10:06 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.