idle in gear - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2007, 03:36 PM   #11
Registered Member
GasSavers_jkandell's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Country: United States
Originally Posted by JanGeo View Post
you want to avoid big power pulses at that low an rpm because the torque springs in the clutch plate are probably bottoming out and is not good for the clutch plate or the gears in the tranny.
When coasting in idle, then shifting into gear....
is it worse to shift to fourth (lower rpm) or into third (higher rpm than fourth)? Is the more abrupt change in third (e.g. 950-3000 rpm) worse for the transmission than a smaller change to fourth (e.g. 950 to 2500) with less torque?

GasSavers_jkandell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 04:27 PM   #12
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
The concern should be the percentage of speed differences between the engine rpm and the transmission rpm when the clutch is engaging them. Going from 950 to 3000 in third is more stressful than 950 to 2500 in 4th, which itself is more stressful than 950 to 1000 in 4th+n gear.
If you can't lower the input speed, then raise the engine output speed instead. Bringing the engine rpm up to close to the expected engaged rpm is another means of matching input and output speeds for limiting stress. Engine braking torque if fairly linear, unline the accelerating torque. The braking torque at 3000 isn't really much more force than the braking torque at 2500. No, braking torque isn't a concern either.
Momentum is. The intertial load of using the driveline to accelerate an engine from 950 to 2500 (or 3000) can be much higher than the braking torque depending on how quickly it is done.

Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 08:19 PM   #13
Team GasMisers5!
landspeed's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 440
Country: United States
Idling in gear

The other thing about idling in gear - even on 'standard' throttle cars (not 'throttle by wire'), there is a bypass system. For example, on my car, there is a seperate pipe coming off the air trunking before the throttle body, going to the inlet manifold.

When the load increases at idle, it just lets more air in, with the result of more fuel being injected.

Any car that didn't have this system (and ran on petrol/gas) would cut out really easily.


Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 (0 kWh used)
landspeed is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly siggy azlan96 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 04-14-2011 11:05 PM
Suggestion: Other ideas for comparing cars' data jjmatt33 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 6 08-08-2008 01:38 PM
Make the page lengths 30 posts again, please SVOboy Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 05-18-2006 12:43 PM
Happy Holidays everyone! Matt Timion General Discussion (Off-Topic) 10 12-29-2005 11:07 AM
vegpowered systems GasSavers_Diemaster Vegetable Oil and BioDiesel 2 09-08-2005 04:53 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.