Back Again - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-14-2010, 02:20 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 64
Country: United States
Talking Back Again

Hello Folks!

Was around a couple years ago with an old F150. Never got much of a response out of it as far as fuel economy goes. Trying to get some miles out of a Ranger now...

Not a whole lot done to it as far is fuel economy goes. Guess the underdrive crank pulley and synthetic fluids help some. Just finished converting the mechanical fan over to an electric taurus fan. Hopefully that'll help
__________________

__________________
Bubba Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:36 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Welcome back.

Manual or auto?

A Ranger is probably my next car. I can't wait to see your gaslog.
__________________

__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:49 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 64
Country: United States
3.0V6 w/ the 5spd manual. I don't recommend this engine. Ford has the 4.0 for power and the different 4 bangers for economy, but the 3.0 doesn't do either very well. Oh well...
__________________
Bubba Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:59 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
As I've read, the 4 bangers are not tolerable, though I suspect I and other hypermilers could tolerate the lack of power.

If you don't mind sharing, how much did you pay for it?
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:05 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 64
Country: United States
Depends which 4 banger. The older ones were gutless, but the new 2.3L Duratecs are only rated for about 10HP less than my V6 but easily get 5+ MPG more. Not sure which year ranger started getting the Duratech.

As for the truck, I paid about $3500 for it a year or so ago. Moderate miles (around 100K) and good condition.

EDIT - Mid 2001 and up rangers could get the 2.3 Duratech which had 143HP (compared to my 160) BUT is rated for about 5mpg (mixed) over the 3.0.
__________________
Bubba Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimal Best MPG Throttle Display GasSavers_maximilian General Fuel Topics 13 03-29-2009 06:32 PM
6Cyl running on 4 TeamExploder General Fuel Topics 6 11-09-2007 07:00 PM
VW Rabbit Diesel Engine flow work hotroddr General Maintenance and Repair 5 02-14-2007 07:34 AM
Volkwagon Creates Fuel Efficient Prototype - 235MPG!!! Bunger Automotive News, Articles and Products 26 05-05-2006 12:59 PM
1989 Suzuki Mini Truck iburnh2o For Sale 0 04-02-2006 06:57 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.