'68 Charger's MPG - Fuelly Forums
Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2012, 06:39 PM   #1
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Country: United States
'68 Charger's MPG

Is it possible to take the modern charger's hemi engine (say from 2007) and place it into a older model charger's body for the sake of better gas mileage?

new2carss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2012, 04:51 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Country: United States
Location: CT
Re: '68 Charger's MPG

Without a doubt. But it is going to take a lot of work. You're likely to get around 15mpg out of it, which is a fair bit better than the 7 or so that an old hemi would get.

With a full tune and a lot of work, you might get as high as 20-25mpg out of it. If you keep your foot out of the vroom pedal.

Wyldesoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 03:01 AM   #3
Registered Member
IndyFetch's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 626
Country: United States
Location: Indianapolis
Re: '68 Charger's MPG

There are companies that are already doing that. I think there is an article in the March or April issue of Car and Driver from a company that does that.
IndyFetch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 05:19 PM   #4
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 77
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, OH
Send a message via ICQ to occupant Send a message via AIM to occupant Send a message via Yahoo to occupant
Let's compare apples to apples.

Hemi 60s Charger, 425hp gross, probably rated very low for insurance purposes, but let's say 425 net hp, and it probably got about 10 city, 13 highway
Hemi modern Charger, 425hp net, probably pretty accurate, EPA rating of a 2010 6.1L model says 13 city, 19 highway
Hemi modern Charger, 340hp net, this is the 5.7L model, EPA rating is 16 city 25 highway.

So if you want to match this pony for pony, The 6.1L engine if used with all the computer and wiring and sensors and matched up with the same transmission, tire diameter, rear axle ratio, and everything, should get the same or slightly BETTER mileage. After all, the '68 Charger weighs LESS than the '10 Charger, by 200lbs. This may be offset by aerodynamics?

But wait, there's more.

The new 6.1L Hemi weighs about 240lbs less than the original 426 Hemi. So now we're talking a 440lb weight reduction. Some of this may be offset by using the modern overdrive transmission and adding the computer and wiring. I wish I had specs for the 5-speed automatic in the 2010 Charger R/T but I don't. The old 727 Torqueflite was about 160lbs with fluid and converter, so it's pretty light and the WA580 is supposed to be light as well so let's say they're the same.

I say use the 5.7L version. Should be able to match mpg for mpg with the modern one if not slightly better due to reduced weight. Actually, I would be plenty happy in a 3895lb car, oops sorry, I mean a 3455lb car, to have all of 340hp on tap. The 230hp EFI 318 in my wife's Durango is pulling around 4100lbs of truck and it's PLENTY quick with a 3.55 gear. With 340hp and less weight, you could go so deep in gears, maybe a 2.94 or a 2.76, and still have all the power you need to maintain highway speeds.

My goal is to take that EFI 318 and 4-speed auto from my wife's Durango when she FINALLY gives it up, and drop it in a nice 3-seat Coronet or Satellite wagon, probably 68-69 for the Coronet, 68-70 for the Satellite. A 1969 Coronet wagon with a 318 and automatic was a 3688lb car and it's lower to the ground than a Durango. The 19mpg that engine gets in the Durango with 3.55 gears would probably be more like 24-25mpg in the Coronet considering it usually came with a 2.76 axle standard. A vacuum gauge, judicious use of brakes, planning WAY ahead, LRR tires, smoothing the underbody, smooth hubcaps, wheel skirts out back, synthetic oils and greases, and making sure it's fully tuned up could see 30mpg in theory. I had a tank once in the Durango pull 21mpg in careful driving with the AC off all the time and the windows up and never over 60mph. It CAN BE DONE.
occupant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 08:38 PM   #5
Registered Member
VetteOwner's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
Country: United States
can be done yea. BUT i feel your killing the way the charger was. I dunno i just have a soft spot for big iron v8's back then. so freakin simple and sound the best.

but yea aero wise the old charger body as a whole doesnt look that bad it just the flat front end(grille area) and the high ground clearance it has is what kills thier MPG i think. but they look oh so good!!!
VetteOwner is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not very precise mpg calculation larjerr Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 08-20-2012 01:03 AM
Car ideas madnessspirit General Fuel Topics 17 01-12-2012 07:30 PM
How to driving with load or DWL not understanding guest001 Hypermiling 4 01-02-2012 08:51 AM
Tools you keep in the car? GasSavers_maximilian Experiments, Modifications and DIY 57 10-08-2009 08:41 PM
Congratulations Jared!!! SVOboy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 7 08-13-2006 08:55 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.