Better mileage with premium gas? - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-28-2008, 03:06 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 17
Country: United States
Better mileage with premium gas?

Would mileage increase in a car that normally runs on regular? If so, is it even close to being cost effective?

Sorry if this has been asked before...

, Bill
__________________

neverendz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 03:46 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Common question. For most cars, the answer is a resounding "no". Recent information suggests that it could reduce mileage.

Now, while gas is cheap, is a great time to experiment.
__________________

__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 03:49 PM   #3
Site Team
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 658
Country: United States
Generally you will get the best gas mileage by running the lowest possible octane without any knock (knock retard)

-BC
__________________
Think you are saving gas? Prove it by starting a Gas Log, then conduct a proper experiment.
bobc455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2008, 11:28 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_SD26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 529
Country: United States
Yeah, no more BTU's in premium unleaded vs regular unleaded.
__________________
Dave
GasSavers_SD26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 02:56 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 170
Country: United States
Bill,
I did some experiments myself about a year or so ago to answer that same question.
In summary for my car (3.8 V6 , GM sedan , 4L60E trans. ) taken over about 1 , 500 klms ( around 900 or so miles) and mixed driving with some city , some free way / country the results were:

Yes , BUT.
In my experience there IS an advantage but the result is not cost effective.

The fuel economy is around 5% better on premium but the cost is (or was when I did it ) about 7 to 10% more to buy the stuff.
Others may have different results.

Cheers , Pete.
GasSavers_Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:44 AM   #6
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,719
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
In theory you could get a gain in mileage if:

A. When running on 87 octane your knock sensor in your car is sensing sending signals to your engine computer, and your computer is retarding the timing as a result.

B. You build an engine with higher than stock compression, and advance the timing.

In either case the added fuel economy does not pay for itself. The money you spend to get that extra MPG is more than you save.

-Jay
__________________








Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 11:33 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Country: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue View Post
..............................In either case the added fuel economy does not pay for itself. The money you spend to get that extra MPG is more than you save.

-Jay
Re:the above comment. My personal experience with the gas prices in where I live suggests that this is very true, even if higher octane can really help some cars get slightly more mpg in some situations. Octane 94 gas is a lot more expensive than regular gas.
Also, I am yet to see higher octane really helps my present cars get noticeably more mpg .
swng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 05:32 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
Rick Rae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 240
Country: United States
I ran an extended test (for a different purpose) in which I ran Regular, Plus, and Premium. My results were similar to Pete's: I appeared to get slightly better mileage on Premium, but it wasn't cost-effective. Plain old Regular works best for me.

Rick
__________________
Rick Rae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 07:57 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 256
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by neverendz View Post
Would mileage increase in a car that normally runs on regular? If so, is it even close to being cost effective?

Sorry if this has been asked before...

, Bill
I actually tried this at one time and could not determine more than a very negligable difference, which I attributed to minor variances in wind, traffic, my foot, etc, etc. Nothing really measureable. I was running Sunoco 94 octaine (highest you could get at the time). Cost was a lot more than regular.
__________________
Dave
GasSavers_GasUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 05:11 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
kamesama980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, IN, USA
Send a message via AIM to kamesama980 Send a message via Yahoo to kamesama980
I umteenth the 'depends on your car but probably negligable and not cost-effective' vote. under certain conditions my cressida gets better mileage with it and slightly more power.
__________________

__________________
-Russell
1991 Toyota Pickup 22R-E 2.4 I4/5 speed
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 I6/5-speed manual
mechanic, carpenter, stagehand, rigger, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
kamesama980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recent Fuel-ups Graph Scale rcsheets Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 09-08-2008 03:11 AM
Current TV spot merckrx General Fuel Topics 1 08-14-2008 06:36 AM
Why did it take me so long to find this place? Baranfin Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 6 05-31-2008 04:17 PM
FE driving, good for mpg but bad for emissions? omgwtfbyobbq General Fuel Topics 21 05-16-2007 08:39 AM
An American Perspective on Driving in Canada rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 28 03-24-2006 09:42 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.