Determining BSFC map from logged OBD2 data - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-29-2008, 08:24 PM   #11
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 211
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
I'm thinking your best bet would be to do several runs, at 10% throttle, 15%, 20%, etc. Run from as low a speed as you can up to max rpm, choosing a gear that allows you to max out at a reasonable speed, so aero drag isn't a big issue.
You could get a lot of nice data to massage if you did that..

Update rate will be critical in getting good data.
__________________

__________________
94 Altima 5 spd.. Stock.. 29 mpg combined with basic hypermiling techniques ..

89 Yamaha FZR400 Crotch rocket, semi naked with only the bikini fairing, no lowers, 60 plus mpg

87 Ranger 2.3 5spd.. Does not currently run..
fumesucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 04:50 AM   #12
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 211
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
Do you need to know the output? Sure, to have a true BSFC chart you do.

I think what's more useful to us, though, is a throttle-based chart. TPS vs rpm, with rings of fuel usage. Throttle position is something we can directly control, vs horsepower output.
A vacuum gauge will give you engine load..

Essentially the engine will be most efficient at a given vacuum setting and rpm.

Vacuum doesn't necessarily equate strictly with tps.
__________________

__________________
94 Altima 5 spd.. Stock.. 29 mpg combined with basic hypermiling techniques ..

89 Yamaha FZR400 Crotch rocket, semi naked with only the bikini fairing, no lowers, 60 plus mpg

87 Ranger 2.3 5spd.. Does not currently run..
fumesucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 06:36 AM   #13
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumesucker View Post
Vacuum doesn't necessarily equate strictly with tps.
I should hope not. Except in DBW cars, TPS equates strictly with your right foot.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 06:59 AM   #14
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 211
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
I should hope not. Except in DBW cars, TPS equates strictly with your right foot.
I was trying to be nice.
__________________
94 Altima 5 spd.. Stock.. 29 mpg combined with basic hypermiling techniques ..

89 Yamaha FZR400 Crotch rocket, semi naked with only the bikini fairing, no lowers, 60 plus mpg

87 Ranger 2.3 5spd.. Does not currently run..
fumesucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 11:04 AM   #15
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 408
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
Then you frame through the video and record the meter reading alongside the logged TPS and RPM readings. I've been considering doing something like that.
Sorry I've been away for a while. Thank you for acknowledging me.

I think these various efforts to create BSFC measurements sound very promising. I hope to hear more about what kind of results people come up with.
monroe74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 10:23 PM   #16
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 211
Country: United States
I got my ELM327 in the mail today.. After a little experimentation this evening I think I may have found the software that will calculate a BSFC map from the OBD2 data..

Take a look and tell me what you think..

http://www.edgeanalysis.com/obd2.asp
__________________
94 Altima 5 spd.. Stock.. 29 mpg combined with basic hypermiling techniques ..

89 Yamaha FZR400 Crotch rocket, semi naked with only the bikini fairing, no lowers, 60 plus mpg

87 Ranger 2.3 5spd.. Does not currently run..
fumesucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 12:02 PM   #17
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 408
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumesucker View Post
I think I may have found the software that will calculate a BSFC map from the OBD2 data..
That's an interesting product. Thanks for pointing it out.

I see that they are displaying and logging lots of OBD2 data. But I don't see where they are attempting to do any power calculations, like BSFC. So I guess you could export the raw data and apply your own procedure for deriving BSFC, but I think most of that work is going to happen outside this program. They're giving you raw speed data, but you have to translate that into acceleration, and then translate that into power, and then relate that to fuel use.

The power calculation includes tricky factors like whether or not you're traversing a grade, and the effect of aero drag at different speeds. These calculations are much simpler if you live on a planet with no hills and no atmosphere. Anyway, I don't see where that program attempts to tackle these issues. But maybe it's in there and I didn't notice!

And there's a separate issue, which I think you already know about. OBD (at least for most makers) doesn't read the injectors. So any fuel-use calculation is some kind of calculated approximation, based on things like air flow. This is how the Scangauge works, and I think under certain conditions it creates problems with accuracy.

Either way, I'm interested in hearing more about what you're doing, because I think you're on the right track and you're inevitably going to make helpful discoveries.
monroe74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 05:10 AM   #18
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 211
Country: United States
I haven't had time to do any more testing, but I got the impression that there was the option to do custom math in the program..

One problem I see with the program on the old laptop I have is that that it uses Microshaft's dot net framework and the update rate is considerably slower than a couple of other similar but less capable programs I have tried. The newer high level programming languages can be glacially slow on older machines, it took nearly half an hour to install the dot net framework on my laptop.

I know that there are some potentially tricky calculations to do and a few different factors to take into account.. Anywhere near my home there is no such thing as a flat, straight and actually level road so I plan on taking multiple measurements over the course of probably ten or twenty miles of driving and averaging the results.

I think one of the reasons that Scangauge loses accuracy sometimes is because many cars go into DFCO sometimes and Scangauge does not allow for that. As you say, OBD2 does not seem to directly access injector pulse width so all fuel consumption figures are inferred from other data.

However, as long as the engine is closed loop I think the fuel useage measurements from OBD2 data are probably pretty close, for this reason I intend to monitor the open loop/closed loop status and only process data that is taken during closed loop running.
__________________
94 Altima 5 spd.. Stock.. 29 mpg combined with basic hypermiling techniques ..

89 Yamaha FZR400 Crotch rocket, semi naked with only the bikini fairing, no lowers, 60 plus mpg

87 Ranger 2.3 5spd.. Does not currently run..
fumesucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 06:51 AM   #19
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
One piece of data that may help you: OBDII reports Open Loop during DFCO, at least on my VW.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 02:18 PM   #20
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 408
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumesucker View Post
as long as the engine is closed loop I think the fuel useage measurements from OBD2 data are probably pretty close
I'm really not sure. I think it depends a lot on the circumstances. For example, I suspect the SG/OBD2 approach also has a problem with cars that have a wideband O2 sensor (e.g., most modern VWs, I think). I think the SG calculations assume AFR that's stoich. With a wideband sensor, real AFR could differ quite a bit from stoich.

I also suspect the problem is insidious, in that the accuracy issues might tend to equalize over the course of a fill. Tracking fills is the traditional way to calibrate a SG. Therefore certain kinds of accuracy problems might be concealed. An instantaneous reading, or a trip-based reading, might be wrong, even though we see good accuracy on a fill-to-fill basis. Therefore I suspect some people might feel confident that they are looking at accurate readings, even though the confidence is misplaced.

But I don't want to overstate the point, since it's far better than what most people have (nothing), and the accuracy problems are probably relatively insignificant for most people, most of the time. And being aware of open-loop vs closed-loop will probably help a lot.

Anyway, I see various smart people (like you folks) trying to tackle these issues in new ways, so I'm hopeful that a lot of the mysteries will start getting solved.
__________________

monroe74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.