Does EGR valve matter? - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2011, 05:52 PM   #21
Registered Member
VetteOwner's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
Country: United States
Re: Does EGR valve matter?

i for one have disabled 2 EGR valves because the dang things have broken and aint worth the $80 to replace.

blank off plate and a BB in the vac line solved that...

i doubt a 80 chevette and a 95 s10 4 banger would make a difference haha, 95 does tho an SES light tho...time to remove the bulb!!!

VetteOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2011, 03:17 AM   #22
Registered Member
theholycow's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Re: Does EGR valve matter?

Originally Posted by Sludgy View Post
EGR at part load improves fuel economy because it reduces manifold vacuum and associated throttling losses.
Originally Posted by i-DSi View Post
EGR is also used to control knocking, as it brings combustion temperature down.
These guys have relevant points.

This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 04:00 AM   #23
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4
Country: United States
Re: Does EGR valve matter?

I drive a Tractor Trailer for a living, and I must say on diesels anyway the EGR valves are the worst thing that ever happened to trucking from a horsepower and MPG perspective.
2003 and older models did not have an EGR valve installed.
The difference since 2004 has been more mechanical issues with system clogging up, less power and less MPG.
Although new trucks have worked a lot of the bugs out, there is still major problems with late model trucks.
A lot of owner operators are going back to mechanical engines with no EGR and finding their MPG and power increasing with fewer issues.
Cars and trucks with common sense technologies would have greater efficiency if not for emission standards.
We need to control pollution granted.
I had a 1986 Audi 4000s that got 48 MPG. When we have to buy hybrid system vehicles to get that same mileage we got in the 70 and 80's in cars, I don't believe the market in their mileage advertising.
I wish I had engineering knowledge. I would redesign the fuel system on my cars, and do away with emissions altogether.
If you think emission standards don't affect mileage, then look at European vehicles. They get better mileage and better performance, because their emissions standards are no where near what we deal with.
We could have much better cafe standards if the oil, car companies, and government were not in bed with each other.

Zalittle is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to better the MPG's on my '75 175cc enduro NotYourDay Motorcycles 5 02-04-2010 12:34 PM
Am I crazy for thinking like this? imzjustplayin General Discussion (Off-Topic) 24 10-19-2008 07:53 PM
Hi !! Any Suzuki Drivers Here ??? fitsandy Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 1 09-09-2008 03:44 PM Stickers - Cheap - $4.50 shipped/pair - any color SoAngel For Sale 0 07-12-2008 09:06 AM
Timing chain and FE bowtieguy Experiments, Modifications and DIY 22 11-11-2007 08:48 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.