FE Team Challenge -- Scoring Poll - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

View Poll Results: In the FE Team Challenge, how should the 3-gallon mimimum rule be handled?
Take the Average of 4 team members -- the Team Captain chooses whose data to drop for the month 4 30.77%
3 Members' data are included: Automatically, using Max/Min number of gallons used 2 15.38%
Leave the Rule, Penalize the Driver (NOTE: if you choose this option, please provide some reasoning) 7 53.85%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-08-2007, 11:03 AM   #21
Registered Member
 
zpiloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondlarry View Post
This is just my $.02 worth. I want to start out by saying that I don't have any trouble meeting the 3 gallon min so for me it's not an issue. But, I have to wonder if it's really all that neccessary. Let me explain. I fill my tank ALL the way to the top every time so it seems to me that there would be very little if any chance for variation in fill-ups by using this method. I have done this on every car I've owned in the past(both new and used) and have had no problems with expansion/leakage or damaging the charcoal canister. I realize that this is a very personal issue and I'm not putting anyone down because they do things different than I do. Perhaps we could allow those who don't use a full 3 gallons to do the top-of-the-tank method since it would virtually eliminate any variations in fill accuracy? Again, just my $.02 worth. I would hate to lose MetroMPG on a technicality like that.
I agree I would hate to lose Metro to something like this and I don't think we should. Right now this is something that's not a problem he made the required fill. Even when he went 4 months without fueling when he did that was over 9 gallons.

The filler neck fill is just not consistant. Look at gaslogs most of the big jumps happen from less than 3 gallons. It might be the pump that causes the problem but when you look at gaslogs the one common demoninator is the biggest jumps are less then 3 gallons. Even SG are not accurate look at metro last fill.
__________________

zpiloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 01:43 PM   #22
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
omgz, wtf's up wit int3rn3tz dr4m4z? even here? *sigh*
__________________

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 02:12 PM   #23
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Wha?

Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq View Post
omgz, wtf's up wit int3rn3tz dr4m4z? even here? *sigh*
What?

I'm sorry, I don't speak Internetonian -- and Babbelfish is down
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 02:17 PM   #24
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by rh77 View Post
What?

I'm sorry, I don't speak Internetonian -- and Babbelfish is down
Apology accepted! Was Babbelfish ever up?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 04:56 PM   #25
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Yeah, life's pretty good when this is the biggest conflict a person has to deal with eh?

My "baseline" fill was within the 28 days. So technically I'm OK. It just means my recent driving doesn't benefit my team this sesson.

However it will apply to the next one, and it makes it far more likely I'll pass the 3-gal threshold within 28 days.

So let's just go with that.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 08:39 PM   #26
Registered Member
 
zpiloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by CO ZX2 View Post
I think it would be in the best interests of all concerned to leave the rules as they started. 14 of 15 team members accepted the rules as written and were very careful to follow them.

Everyone on every team was fully aware of the 3 gallon minimum fillup required each 28 days. Everyone was also fully aware that if there was no fillup that it woud cost their team 5% of their EPA average. Any one of us knew full well the consequences of not having a proper fillup.
Actually we have been changing the rules since the first post on this. As I mention several times this is a work in progress.

The idea of the 3 gallon fill was for accuracy not punishment. Let's keep the 3 gallon min fill but make the cycles 42 days instead of 28 days. That would enable us to still have 2, 6 month series with 4 cycles instead of 6. It would also allow folks that are trying to set the records tanks to make them instead of having to fill because of the competition, which I think was quit a few, and let the misers stay on board even through winter.

It sticks to the basic rule of KISS. Remember this is suppose to be fun.

I think this is a great compromise and should be option 4.
zpiloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 08:45 PM   #27
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Drama not Withstanding

OK, I just want to make something clear here.

The poll was set up to get the opinion of the competitors. My role in this competition is to settle disputes, process data, and hopefully promote some goodwill that the concerns of team members are heard and considered -- on an unbiased level.

Since this is the first of its kind, it's a work-in-progress. I can tell you from a Project Management standpoint that you can try to think of everything in the beginning, but there WILL be something that takes you by surprise and you have to roll with it.

omgwtfbyobbq: My suggestion is to make a meaningful statement as to your vote, per polite request. Just because it's "dramatic" doesn't mean we can't deal with it. It's an intelligent discussion. Let's keep it civil.

-Rick / Commissioner

EDIT:

Z: It looks like we posted at the same time. So how does the group feel about a 48-day cycle? Let me know if another poll is required.
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 08:48 PM   #28
DRW
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 615
Country: United States
babbelfish? HA!
try GIZOOGLE
http://sites.gizoogle.com/index2.php...ssavers.org%2F
__________________
Dave W.
DRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 09:34 PM   #29
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
42-Day Cycle

NEW INFORMATION

There has been a proposal to extend the cycle from 28 days to 42-days. This should indeed allow most parties to gain the additional gallons required to avoid penalty.

Thus far, 6 have voted to keep the rules the same and 6 have voted to change the rules in 2 separate vote choices. This has prompted additional discussion.

I'm requesting that those who have already voted to comment on this new proposal.

Thanks all -- and keep up the great tanks!

-Der Kommisar
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 04:45 AM   #30
Team GasMisers5!
 
landspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 440
Country: United States
I would vote for 42-day cycles if there was an option.
__________________

__________________

Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 (0 kWh used)
Hypomiler
landspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brake and light inspection SupraRXZ General Maintenance and Repair 8 10-04-2006 02:06 AM
Any foreign language speakers here? Matt Timion General Discussion (Off-Topic) 12 09-19-2006 03:13 PM
Honda Jet zpiloto General Discussion (Off-Topic) 1 09-14-2006 10:56 AM
Buy an Insight, cheap FormulaTwo General Discussion (Off-Topic) 13 09-13-2006 03:22 AM
State of the Union address touches on "oil addiction." Matt Timion General Discussion (Off-Topic) 31 02-06-2006 04:38 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.