GS FAQ/Glossary, Busted/Confirmed Mods, Archive - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-14-2006, 11:15 PM   #21
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 73
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by civicminded
SuperMID = Super Mileage Indicator Device?
It is Super Multi Information Display.
model M-1 : mileage meter
model T-1 : tacho and water/intake-air temp
model C-1 : CAN message

Yoshi
__________________

GasSavers_Yoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2006, 06:47 AM   #22
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I'm going to start adding links as citations. You can scroll down and see the link first or click the citation.
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2006, 11:04 AM   #23
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_civicminded's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
It is Super Multi Information Display.
model M-1 : mileage meter
model T-1 : tacho and water/intake-air temp
model C-1 : CAN message

Yoshi
Thanks Mr. Yoshi - You have made quite a nice device there. Sorry about getting the acronym incorrect.
__________________
www.onetruth.com
www.sohchonda.com

GasSavers_civicminded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2006, 02:46 PM   #24
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Added some more links, just going through the forums digging stuff up at current time, does anyone have any that they've bookmarked they want up?
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 07:41 AM   #25
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Added a few more of the new stuff, anyone wanna help me out with stuff they might've bookmarked/found notable?
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2006, 07:40 PM   #26
Registered Member
 
Mighty Mira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Country: United States
Anyone care to clue me in on what A-B-A testing is? I assume that's driving from A to B at a fixed speed, driving from B to A at a fixed speed, adding up the total distance and total fuel used over both journeys and dividing to
get a fuel economy figure?
Mighty Mira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2006, 07:57 PM   #27
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
You test configuration A, then configuration B, then configuration A again.

95metro, write something about it for the glossary,
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 08:02 AM   #28
Registered Member
 
95metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 498
Country: United States
Serious testing takes time and energy.

A-B-A testing is the ONLY method of properly quantifying the possible gains or losses of a "fuel-saving" (or power producing) device.

The absolute best method is usually not available to us. This would consist of a dyno, a rolling road, and a test lab with absolute controlled environment. This would remove most of the variables that on-road tests are generally prone to.

On-road tests with some form of data collection (ie - ScanGauge, SuperMID, data acquisition computer/software) are always at the mercy of the elements. Temperature, humidity, wind, and (most of all) the driver are variables that cannot be determined as to their affects on a given test.

However, a calm, warm day and a relatively flat road (or predetermined "track") will provide some data to at least make educated assumptions on. At the very least it puts theories in the "plausible" category.

For sake of reference I will refer to the chosen roadway as a "track".

"A" will refer to the test vehicle in "stock" or "current" (if already modified) condition.

"B" will refer to the test vehicle with the "device" or "additive" installed.

Weather and track conditions must be recorded before each run. For optimum results the test vehicle should be warmed to operating temperture and then driven on the track numerous times in its "A" condition to establish a baseline and/or margin of error between runs. I personally feel that multiple runs are necessary since environment and driving style could cause fluctuations in fuel economy during each run.

Example: Test vehicle in "A" condition
Run1: 42.5 mpg
Run2: 43.3 mpg
Run3: 42.1 mpg
Run4: 42.9 mpg

This establishes some form of baseline for what the test vehicle is capable of on this particular day at this particular time. The margin of error is 1.2 mpg between the best and worst runs. Now, let's attach the device/additive in question and do more runs (it may even be best to drive the test vehicle normally for a set amount of time before performing each set of runs).

Example: Test vehicle in "B" condition
Run1: 43.5 mpg
Run2: 42.8 mpg
Run3: 43.1 mpg
Run4: 42.5 mpg

In this particular example I would personally consider this "device" as busted. All of the numbers easily fall within the previously established margin of error and I would feel no particular need to continue testing. However, what if the results had been like this:

Example: Test vehicle in "B" condition
Run1: 45.5 mpg
Run2: 45.7 mpg
Run3: 44.9 mpg
Run4: 46.1 mpg

In this case every run is higher than the car in "A" condition. As a plus, it is even higher than our 1.2 mpg difference we previously calculated. At this point, the test cannot be considered conclusive at all. First, the test vehicle must be returned to its "A" condition and the runs must be repeated to make certain it returns to figures close to the original baseline. If it does not, then something changed the test conditions and the results must be scrapped.

If it does return to its baseline, the vehicle must now be placed back in "B" condition and the runs repeated once more. This is called "repeatability". If the numbers once again improve we know that the device is "working".

However, this still is not an absolute test. For one, only one vehicle is being tested. For another, the test should be performed again on a different day. Different vehicles and testing on different days would ensure that the device is indeed causing an improvement in mileage. If it really does work we should see slight to obvious results every time the device is added regardless of vehicle or environment.

Sorry for being so long and wordy with this. Maybe I should have put it in the "articles" section...
__________________
95metro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 09:55 AM   #29
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Wicked good A-B-A info, 95metro, check your thread and your inbox,
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 10:07 AM   #30
Registered Member
 
Mighty Mira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Country: United States
Nice, that was excellent 95 metro.
__________________

Mighty Mira is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difficult w/ Fuelly & Blackberry Bster13 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 04-01-2012 12:39 PM
feature requests ThatGuyDuncan Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 09-18-2008 01:18 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.