Has anyone seen info on r.r. of low aspect ratio tires? - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-14-2007, 07:47 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
theclencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 542
Country: United States
Question Has anyone seen info on r.r. of low aspect ratio tires?

Some theorize that low aspect ratio tires have lower rolling resistance. I've been digging around the web and haven't come across any quality articles or data on it. Has anyone?
__________________

__________________
Tempo/Topaz:
Old EPA 23/33/27
New EPA 21/30/24

F150:
New EPA12/14/17

theclencher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 07:59 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
I found this from Toyo
Quote:
Tire Aspect Ratio and Rolling resistance
Generally lower aspect ratios are likely to be advantageous for rolling resistance. If the construction and materials are identical, a 60-series tire has less rolling resistance than a 70-series by about 5%.
From an article on a govt site.
Quote:
This report examines the current and expected future trends in highway tire design and their effects on vehicle rolling resistance and fuel economy.^The primary emphasis is on passenger cars, operated under conditions typified by the US Environmental Protection Agency Urban, Highway, and Combined Cycles, and heavy duty trucks operated over the road.^Analytical and experimental data indicate rolling resistance-fuel economy sensitivity factors of 0.2 for passenger cars over the Combined Cycle, and 0.4 for a fully loaded tractor-van trailer at 55 mph.^Improved radial construction, low hysteresis materials, and higher inflation pressures are the primary mechanisms through which passenger car tire rolling resistance has been reduced.^Further design refinements are expected in the near future to achieve reduced rolling resistance and optimal ride and handling qualities at acceptable production cost.^Similarly, heavy duty truck tire designs have been improved through the use of radial construction, and further rolling resistance reduction is expected through design modifications such as lower aspect ratio.
It seems like a tradeoff between load and Crr. Bicycle tires have so little aspect ratio they can't even hydroplane and excellent, CRR. However they also can't carry much very fast.
__________________

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 08:50 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
Np!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2007, 06:11 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
Reeeeaaallllyy? Interesting. None of the hybrids have anything close to a low aspect ratio tire, so I expected that high profile was the way to go for FE...
__________________
Bill in Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2007, 07:08 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
MakDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 200
Country: United States
high profile is mainly for comfort versus performance. A lower sidewall gives you a more quick response due to less flex from said sidewall. Lower profile tires require larger diameter rims to compensate, increasing weight (unless you get lightweight rims) and leads to more curb rash on rims due to a combo of less rim edge to ground clearance and harsh road conditions or unskilled maneuvering around your local Wal-mart, chatting up a friend on your cell and not looking out for the 6" raised concrete apex you just nailed (saw this last week). I assume the tire selection on hybrids has to due w/ them primarily being used as family transportation and not autobahn demons. Low profile sacrifices comfort and soccer moms and dads can't have that. Not offense to soccer or ppl w/ kids. Mak
__________________
'85 CRX Si Original EW3 @ 254k...suck it Detroit
'89 CRX HF-Z1 ~ When haste is needed
'97 Civic DX Hatch ~ Formerly 600hp, now 0hp, soon 115hp.

MakDiesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Feature: Loan and lease cost labrie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 02-08-2012 02:12 AM
Data/Chart Discrepancy PTH Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 07-02-2010 08:14 AM
Basic Stats poorboymeyer Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 09-22-2009 09:19 AM
Incorrect Milage Calcuatlion PatM Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 07-17-2009 08:21 PM
Both odometer and trip mileage? tiffehr Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-08-2008 05:55 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.