hf, vx, or hx? - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-14-2007, 09:46 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 49
Country: United States
hf, vx, or hx?

well my gas hog explorer is up for sale, and i think im gonna get one of these three (and/or a ninja 250).

hx - 36 mpg
hf - 40 mpg
vx - 42 mpg

the hx i would like because im a huge fan of ek (96-00 civic) coupes, the hf i would like because i love crx's.

the vx gets the best mileage, but im not a fan of the hatchbacks. i think it would be cool to get a coupe, and transfer everything over (engine, trans, ecu, etc...) and still have all the bonus's of the vx with a (imo) much better looking body.

i think im leaning toward the hx, because its the newest, best looking imo, but its also the heaviest with the worst mpg (probably related)
__________________

__________________
ezeedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 09:50 PM   #2
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
ezeedee -

I was going to say go for the HX because of age and ScanGauge compatibility.

Jus' bein' practical,

CarloSW2
__________________

__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 10:08 PM   #3
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
considering your feelings about the hatchbacks, etc., I'd say to go for the HX. I would advise NOT to put the VX engine in though. It's pretty much the same engine as the HX, only .1L smaller.

besides, the d15z1 is obd1, and you won't be able to use the scangauge.

I say HX and do an underbelly tray... and maybe sell me the wheels.
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 10:09 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Danronian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 652
Country: United States
If you want a lot of cargo space, and more back-seat room, go with the VX.

Otherwise, go with the HX.

Both are great cars, but from personal experience, I think the VX has more room in the back seat, and for hauling whatever you can fit in it. It is older, and harder to find with low miles compared to an HX, so I can see how that would be a factor. If you want a civic coupe, and want to be able to convert it to a VX, go with a 92-95 coupe since they are cheaper, are more plug-and-play with obd1, and are lighter. You could start with a stripped down DX coupe (very cheap) which would almost weigh as little as the VX, or you could get all the options you want with an EX.

Good luck on the hunt!
__________________


On the never-ending quest for better gas mileage...
Danronian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 10:22 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
ajohnmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 87
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to ajohnmeyer
Depending on what part of the country you're in and what kind of driving you do I'd get the HF. If you're in a part of the country that doesn't salt the roads in the winter (no/little rust on older cars) and you mainly drive city miles I'd get the HF. Sure it's small, but the HF has a fantasically low curb weight. I swapped a ZC motor and SI tranny into my old HF and it still had a curb weight of only 1982 lbs. That low curb weight will help a LOT with city driving.
If you're doing more highway driving the lean- burn mode of the VX will come in handy.
And lastly the HX. I'd get the HX as a last resort if you live in the rust belt where older cars are just full of holes and an Insight is just too expensive.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." -The Drive By Truckers

Team OPEC Busters!
ajohnmeyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 11:00 PM   #6
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
HX is pretty decent,
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 12:26 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 298
Country: United States
Or you could get an HF, and swap in a VX motor. This way, you are getting the best of both worlds, so to speak. You get the styling and light weight of the CRX, along with the VTEC-E motor of the VX. And because of the lighter weight and better aerodynamics of the HF, you will also get fuel economy AND performance than you would get from either the HF or the VX. And finally, there is the price tag. You can buy a CRX do this swap for quite a bit less than you would pay for a VX. Just avoid 1990-1991 HFs if you can, as they are significantly heavier than 1988-1989 HFs. The 1990-1991 HF, by the way, can be differentiated from the 1988-1989 HF by its door-mounted seatbelts.
StorminMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 07:27 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
Given your affliction towards the 96-00 body style, the availability, and the compatibility with the SG, I'd go with the HX, just don't get the CVT (auto) HX.
__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 12:22 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Country: United States
Location: Connecticut
I also have been considering an HX for my next car.
Any concerns about the care and feeding of these?
Do you need to watch out for some oddball parts like plugs or O2 sensor that aren't stocked in a typical parts store?
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 04:23 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 228
Country: United States
I would guess that the hx has similar issues with the oxygen sensor--it may have to be in good condition to go into lean burn. Other than that, i would guess that emission equip might be more complicated, with a more expensive cat since it is obd2.
__________________

GasSavers_James is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
partial fuel up... pbfoot Fuelly Web Support and Community News 6 12-29-2013 11:54 PM
Need advice/info-Metro/HF related GasSavers_Lance General Fuel Topics 19 09-06-2006 10:12 PM
E85 and 10% Ethanol in Unleaded some thoughts ketel0ne General Fuel Topics 2 07-27-2006 03:10 PM
Google Earth Help GasSavers_DaX General Discussion (Off-Topic) 5 06-21-2006 12:44 PM
Diesel Kleen cetane booster diamondlarry General Fuel Topics 10 11-10-2005 02:27 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.