Highest MPG V8? - Page 4 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-22-2008, 03:38 PM   #31
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
I used to regularly approach 30 MPG in my old 74 Chevy C-10

300,000 miles, a/c, cruise, 350 V8, 4bbl carb, TH350 automatic tranny.

FE mods:

Electronic ignition out of a 75 Chevy van, platinum plugs, flipped air cleaner lid upside down, and aftermarket cruise installed.

Then in 75 they started putting emissions crap on light duty trucks and FE dropped quickly.

-Jay
__________________

__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 04:34 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 261
Country: United States
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue View Post
I used to regularly approach 30 MPG in my old 74 Chevy C-10

300,000 miles, a/c, cruise, 350 V8, 4bbl carb, TH350 automatic tranny.
Bull ****


http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...73244466514443

End of thread.
__________________

dieselbenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 04:42 PM   #33
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
I'm sorry if you don't believe it, but I did do it. Emissions stuff really takes its toll on FE, especially the early emissions stuff. In the 74 Chevy I'd do 27 - 28 on the highway, and I'd usually average 20 in daily driving. The older cars got pretty decent mileage. Even my old 1980 Bonneville wagon regularly got 16 MPG with a 4bbl carb, TH350 tranny,a big block V-8, and a 16 year old driving it. When I bought Rusty I thought Wow, this truck has dual tanks. Imagine how far I can go on dual tanks... Turned out that it needed dual tanks to go as far as the 74 went on one...
__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 05:41 PM   #34
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
In addition to emissions, there's the sheer amount of power available in newer vehicles, required for these purposes:
- decent acceleration with the much larger amount of weight in modern vehicles
- 2wd regular cab 1970 C10: 3,737 pounds of heavy iron
- 2wd regular cab 2008 Silverado: 4,453 pounds of thin sheet metal, hollow aluminum driveshaft, and hydroformed frame
- additional performance for consumers with higher standards
- additional other parasitic loads

Also, consider that modern emissions stuff, while more numerous, is less parasitic. For example, modern catalytic converters flow well...old ones, not so much.

Now, on the weight issue, at least with trucks the extra weight comes with extra capacity, so maybe you could compare a modern 1500 to a classic C20...
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 06:15 PM   #35
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to dkjones96
Tell you what, they get a Kia Rio5 with the 3.5L V6 with a 5-speed and RWD. Buy that puppy in seconds. Probably get pretty decent mileage too.
__________________
- Kyle
dkjones96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 06:19 PM   #36
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,259
Country: United States
Location: wiliamsburg virigina
1978 Olds 88 diesel, until the engine blew up. Regularly went 750 miles on a tank.

regsards
gary
__________________
R.I.D.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 06:46 PM   #37
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
If my memory of late 70's GM cars serves me correctly that car came with a 25 gallon tank? My grandfather had pretty much the same car (84 Delta 88 Brougham). Dad & I were fighting each other for who would get to have grandpa's Delta when he was ready for a new one, but then he just traded it in...

Anyway, back on track here... for a 20 gallon fillup on your Delta 88 would mean you got 37.5 MPG. Not too shabby. Even 750 miles over 25 gallons is 30 MPG. All I have to say about that is WoW!
__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 07:14 PM   #38
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,259
Country: United States
Location: wiliamsburg virigina
55 speed limits helped.

Jay it was my brothers car, long ago memories, the motor disintegrated at 40k miles, probably 700 per tank, or a larger tank, but it did get better than 30 MPG.

This was the huge square land yatch.

regards
gary
__________________
R.I.D.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 07:18 PM   #39
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
I see, it must have had one of those gasoline 350's that GM hurriedly attempted to convert to diesel - I don't think any of them lasted long.

-Jay
__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 08:57 AM   #40
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 689
Country: United States
The Mercury Grand Marquis that my dad has will get about 27-28 highway running 65-75 mph. It has the 4.6L with O/D transmission. Of course it is nothing other than a dressed up Crown Victoria. I'd like to take it on a longer highway drive just to see what I could get out of it. I think I could easily break 30 mpg.

Edit: It will get about 24-25 mpg in just normal shorter trip driving, trips of 50 miles or less driving 50-60 mph.
__________________

__________________
Hipermiler
#47 on my way to #1
Ford Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly API, Remote Update hufman Fuelly Web Support and Community News 6 11-26-2017 11:28 AM
Not very precise mpg calculation larjerr Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 08-20-2012 02:03 AM
Keeping my distance in traffic khurt General Fuel Topics 8 09-07-2008 04:23 AM
Bad Gas...oline 95_corolla General Fuel Topics 22 05-11-2007 09:01 PM
Electrical power and cars. DracoFelis Automotive News, Articles and Products 2 09-16-2006 02:31 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.