Intake Manifold Polishing Theory - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-09-2006, 09:05 PM   #21
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Because it had too much high

Because it had too much high end bias?

What is your opinion on me using that cx/vx exhaust on my d15b2 in terms of mileage?
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 09:13 PM   #22
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 270
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to molecule
first thing i would do is

first thing i would do is measure with a micrometer the port width openings and MAKE ABSOLUTELY SURE that cx exhaust manifold is not a step-down in size...

that would be really bad...probably too much reversion...lack of escape...higher temps...etc...

i dont think it is...but i have never measured...
other than that...the cat is great for the environment...
and it seems to be a good design that has stuck with the economy civics thru 2000...
__________________

__________________
BE ZEITGEISTED
molecule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 09:15 PM   #23
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Did the hx have the same

Did the hx have the same design? Yeah, I figured that cat alone would be a good thing about it, also the o2 sensor would warm up a lot more quickly.

Right now I'm wondering about some cat insulation I saw a while back that keeps it warm for 24 hours to reduce start up emissions.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 12:15 PM   #24
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
the dc 4-1 header on the z1

the dc 4-1 header on the z1 has too much highend/wot bias. remember, the section of the rpm band controls the frequency the gas is pushed ,which indirectly effects the amount of gas. while throttle position decides the amount of gas pushed. the z1 has super small ports and the header is just too large for while in the primary cam. do you follow?

GENERALLY the shorter the primaries and secondaries the lower the intended use in the rpm band. which is why your super expensive headers have adjustable primaries, so that you can tune it for the power band your aiming for and harmonize the lengths of all the primaries so the exhaust flows through the collector sequentially. also the thinner the pipes, the less gas is intended to flow.

google 'anti-reversion' for a little help in understanding some of the tricks with stepped primaries and things of that nature.
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 02:55 PM   #25
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I just have trouble

I just have trouble following the differences in the frequency **** for intake and exhaust, *shrug*

When I get the superMID we'll see some good exhaust ****.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:08 PM   #26
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
intake

With FI the smoother the better as it minimizes the surface area and keeps the air cooler - my xB has plastic intake manifolds that are extreemly smooth and thermally insulating from the engine block temps all adding to more power and MPG. Raising the compression is going to help the most.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:11 PM   #27
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
The plasticness of the

The plasticness of the intake manifold could only hurt FE as I see it, since a warmer intake charge is generally better.

Hence the reason honda people cut off their coolant to the IM and use insulating IM gaskets in order to squeeze more HP.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:23 PM   #28
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
weird

Not with this engine - seems a lot of people are adding cold air intakes and the engine doesn't run right. I get pretty poor mileage when very cold but too hot is bad too - this engine has high compression ratio. Better not to second guess the people that created the motor.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:25 PM   #29
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I'm not second guessing

I'm not second guessing them, but the fact nowadays is that most engines are designed for power.

I think they knew what they were doing, just that they were doing it not for MPG but for power.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:32 PM   #30
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
ok

OK then I guess I should play with a warm air intake - as it is, it takes the air from the left fender under the hood next to the battery to the side of the radiator. I can monitor the intake air temp with the ScanGauge so adding a little ductwork to get some air from the rear of the engine near the header should give some different results. Might be cool to increase the MPG even more ha ha ha!
__________________

JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Diesel in N. Texas? JudisJetta General Fuel Topics 7 05-28-2010 08:55 AM
Large Fuel Tank capacity JQL Fuelly Web Support and Community News 7 04-04-2010 03:52 AM
Recovering faster from partial fill-up hufman Fuelly Web Support and Community News 12 01-12-2010 02:16 AM
Gallons per Mile? nerb Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 11-12-2008 03:33 AM
Throttle spring...pedal vs RPM? ZugyNA General Fuel Topics 17 08-01-2006 04:17 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.