Is lower RPM always more efficient? - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums
Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2009, 08:00 AM   #21
Registered Member
kamesama980's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, IN, USA
Send a message via AIM to kamesama980 Send a message via Yahoo to kamesama980
I'm just hypothesizing how and why.

I doubt any one of those factors would help alone and assume it's the combination. No I don't have real-time data, it's an '87 so real-time readouts are a little more involved. Just trends: 3 or 4 tanks of hard use highway that are 1 mpg better than slower steadier highway and a few tanks from hauling heavy loads like that. Which brings me to driving styles like you mentioned: driving hard and fast at 70-80 gets better mpg (tank) than steady 60, 65, 70, etc. loaded to the tits at the same speed doesn't seem to bother it much.

Kind of like a friend of mine whos car, by all rights, shouldn't be running for the 180k miles, missing/broken wires, vacuum leaks, lack of tuning, and random parts thrown at it. Yet somehow, with an automatic trans to boot, it dyno'd better hp and torque at the wheels than the original advertised @flywheel power specs.

Driving style is pretty similar empty or loaded (except the mentioned hard/fast driving with friends late at night in the city when everyone thinks the freeway's part of the autobahn). the biggest difference is that when loaded down like the latest heavy trip the throttle can be open over 50% just maintaining a steady 65 mph. Accordingly it'll vary from 0-100% depending on hills and traffic wheras empty it'll be 25% to cruise (guess) and vary 0-75% with WOT not really happening. Reaction to hills about the same either way... steady throttle unless speed gets really low.

My mention of the bearings is that it's got tapered rollers in front, recently repacked with amsoil grease and readjusted by yours truly which made a noticeable difference coasting and a solid axle in back which means straight rollers. straight rollers are VERY efficient and won't increase friction nearly as much with weight as any other style bearing. Tires are kept at about 35 psi (sidewall max), I think I upped it to 40 for the latest heavy load.

BUT my truck aside, all other things being equal lower rpm will yield better mpg until you get them so low the engine can't make enough power to cruise. (Like F-bodies and other cars using the T-56 6-speed... you can't even use 6th till you're going at least 70 mph. but once you get there it's doing 1700 rpm @ 80 mph :-p)

1991 Toyota Pickup 22R-E 2.4 I4/5 speed
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 I6/5-speed manual
mechanic, carpenter, stagehand, rigger, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
kamesama980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 02:50 PM   #22
Registered Member
1993CivicVX's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,066
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to 1993CivicVX
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
On another forum, a driver with a Saab turbo swears that his fuel economy is terrible if he stays in a high gear and opens the throttle more, which apparently puts him in boost, and that his fuel economy is much better if he downshifts to run at higher RPM and stay out of turbo.

I'd guess that a modern turbo car with the computer-controlled turbo is more efficient if you do it like him, downshift enough to stay out of boost..
Does this logic translate to lean burn? Substitute going out of lean burn with turbo.... I've been wondering how much better fuel economy the VX gets in lean burn at a given rpm compared to WOT at same RPM.

three stripes the charm!

Car mods are overrated. Just gotta adjust that nut behind the wheel for best mpg.

Forget about World Peace...Visualize using your turn signal.
1993CivicVX is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Basic Stats poorboymeyer Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 09-22-2009 08:19 AM
drivetrain resistance bagpipe goatee General Fuel Topics 9 09-14-2008 09:04 PM
DashDyno? Anyone heard of it yet? BumblingB General Fuel Topics 10 02-20-2008 08:09 AM
New member, old hand kitcar Aerodynamics 30 05-19-2007 05:37 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.