Lighter flywheel? - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-16-2007, 06:12 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Country: United States
Lighter flywheel?

I don't know how many of you do cycling, but the cycling market is always preaching about removing weight from your wheels. SO every time you pedal, you move that much less weight around. Well, would replacing the flywheel of a clutch with one a bit lighter possibly improve FE?
__________________

phantomcow2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 06:30 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Country: United States
Location: Connecticut
I know that performance car people do that.
You get a slightly rougher idle.
Any reduction in rotating mass helps, especially in acceleration. Not sure how much it helps FE in steady state travel.

That's also the original concept behind "mag" (magnesium) wheels and alloy wheels. Less rotating mass. Of course nowadays it's mostly about bling. If you want a lightweight wheel you really have to pay attention to the specs.
__________________

__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 10:41 PM   #3
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
phantomcow2 -

I also heard that it helps performance, but the shifting gets harder, aka difficult to engage "smoothly".

CarloSW2
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 01:02 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
Send a message via MSN to baddog671
Aluminum flywheels are great for improving hp, I'm sure it could be worked backwards to benefit fe instead. Any weight removed is good, esp/ rotational mass..
__________________
baddog671 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 06:14 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,325
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_Ryland
the lighter the flywheel the more you are going to have to crank up the idle speed as well, and the easeyer it's going to be to stall your car when taking off from a dead stop as the flywheel is what smooths out the bumps in your engines speed with every rotation, I think it also might hurt your torque
GasSavers_Ryland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 07:52 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
bones33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 180
Country: United States
Location: Apple Valley, CA
It improves acceleration, has no effect on steady state driving like on the freeway or climbing hills (aside from strict weight reduction). If you do alot of in-town driving you may see some effect. Try it if you are already doing a clutch job, otherwise not worth it in my opinion.

While it's all apart, pay attention to clutch and pressure plate balance, check and balance each item before installation. Some cheaper parts are way off.
bones33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 08:55 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Country: United States
Oh well I would never change it out just because. My clutch is original and has 273,500 miles on it! The master cylinder was recently replaced though.
But sooner or later it will fail on me, I'm just looking ahead.
phantomcow2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 01:14 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 34
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
phantomcow2 -

I also heard that it helps performance, but the shifting gets harder, aka difficult to engage "smoothly".

CarloSW2
Some of us don't use the clutch anyway Well, except for first
parasonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 01:39 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,325
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_Ryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by parasonic View Post
Some of us don't use the clutch anyway Well, except for first
I assume you are sugesting shifting without useing the clutch? I've been in peoples vehicles that alwas do that, and after a while the transmition has so much slop in it that it's scarry, even tho they are still able to shift smooth-ish without the clutch, I would say that for longevity of your drive train that dubble clutching would be the ideal way to go, because your syncronizers have very little stress on them, leaving less particals from wear floating around, leaving you with a tranny that will last almost forever.

If you are replacing your clutch at some point, have it ballenced like was said befor, rotaing mass that is out of ballence is not efficent, of course no one is going to get it perfectly in ballence, so ask around as to what a number of shops find to be an acceptable range, and ask how close to perfection they can get, just like when car tires are ballenced the weights only go down to a quarter ounce or so, but when I ballence my own motorcycle wheels I get much closer by useing lead solder insted of stick on weights and might get within 1/20 of an ounce of being in ballence, and they spin without any vibration.
GasSavers_Ryland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 05:25 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
The flywheels in the VX civics are 3 lbs lighter than all other model civics.

I personally turned down a stock flywheel on a civic from 20lbs. down to 11.25 (balanced to within 1 gram) and had no ill effects on driveability. It had a positive impact on FE as long as you weren't giving it more gas since the car accelerated so effortlessly.
__________________

__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
feature request: updates via text message savraj Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-13-2008 12:21 AM
Boat Tailing a Pickup Snax Aerodynamics 21 03-10-2007 11:52 AM
It happened again! Matt Timion General Fuel Topics 12 09-21-2006 08:26 PM
Measuring Fuel Economy - Instantaneous and Otherwise Mighty Mira General Fuel Topics 12 06-19-2006 05:29 AM
98 civic sedan coefficient of drag? where to find? MetroMPG General Discussion (Off-Topic) 37 02-23-2006 03:26 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.