premium gas a bargain - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-09-2008, 05:19 AM   #11
Supporting Member
 
DracoFelis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 265
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99metro View Post
I went from 85 to 87 octane and my MPG increased 10%. It cost $1 more per fillup to use mid-grade, but I gained another 50 miles on the tank. I actually save $3 a tank full by spending the extra $1 for 87 mid-grade. I won't go back to the cheapest gas, because it costs too much to use it!
FWIW gas octane mixes close to linearly (it's not totally linear, but it is close). So if you want 89 octane, you also have the option of putting in 1/3 of the 93 octane and 2/3 of the 87 octane. And with many stations/pumps, mixing your own octane grade (from a combo of the cheap grade and the high grade) is often cheaper to do than just to pump the mid-grade.

NOTE: If you are going to mix your own grade, always put the high grade stuff in first. The reason is that the gas doesn't totally mix right away, and so you generally want the higher grade stuff in first, so if/when you get unmixed gas you get the higher grade stuff.
__________________

DracoFelis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 09:24 AM   #12
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by DracoFelis View Post
FWIW gas octane mixes close to linearly (it's not totally linear, but it is close). So if you want 89 octane, you also have the option of putting in 1/3 of the 93 octane and 2/3 of the 87 octane. And with many stations/pumps, mixing your own octane grade (from a combo of the cheap grade and the high grade) is often cheaper to do than just to pump the mid-grade.

NOTE: If you are going to mix your own grade, always put the high grade stuff in first. The reason is that the gas doesn't totally mix right away, and so you generally want the higher grade stuff in first, so if/when you get unmixed gas you get the higher grade stuff.
Manufacturer recommends 91 octane.We have 87,89 & 93 octane around here.I never thought about mixing. I might try it and see how the Lude runs.It runs a lot better with 93 but a mixture of 91 might work just has well.
__________________

GAZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 03:45 PM   #13
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Country: United States
Running premium in the Prelude has not gotten me any better gas mileage. I also added the Bosch Platinum + 4 spark plugs and it hasnt helped any either. Fixing to change the wires,distributor cap and rotor. Maybe there will be a change after I have done that. One of the guys at work says I am wasting my money doing this because any added gas mileage will not pay for the added parts. But the car has almost 140,000 miles on it and needs the maintenance whether it helps the mileage or not.
I sure had hoped the premium would get it a little better gas mileage but you cant get everything.
GAZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 03:59 PM   #14
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 140
Country: United States
if your engine is not pinging, premium will not help mpg. if ,however, it allows you to advance timing, then it might help.the difference between 89 and 93 octane is so little, it probably won't allow enough timing change to make a difference.
mikehallbackhoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 06:36 PM   #15
Registered Member
 
Rower4VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 60
Country: United States
The mpg is 10%+ higher in my '97 RL on premium than on regular and premium is only about 7% more expensive here, so it makes sense. The big thing that many people with FlexFuel cars aren't keying in on is that E85 is only $2.97 while regular (E10) is $3.87. That's a 30% difference, and most FF cars only lose 20-25% mileage on E85. In my '94 Vigor it's definitely more cost effective to use E85.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
E85 ~$3.17/gal.
Rower4VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:53 AM   #16
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 28
Country: United States
Location: Briggsdale, CO
I was running 85 (we have it here in the Denver area) and switching to 87 - mid-grade, I got enough MPG increase to warrant paying extra for better economy. I figured I was saving $3.00 a tank by using 87 vice 85. I saw a 10% increase in MPG over at least 4 tanks. I am currently experimenting with my first partial tank of 91.
__________________
99metro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 05:22 AM   #17
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,723
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rower4VT View Post
The mpg is 10%+ higher in my '97 RL on premium than on regular and premium is only about 7% more expensive here, so it makes sense. The big thing that many people with FlexFuel cars aren't keying in on is that E85 is only $2.97 while regular (E10) is $3.87. That's a 30% difference, and most FF cars only lose 20-25% mileage on E85. In my '94 Vigor it's definitely more cost effective to use E85.
I wish E85 was more readily available here. Seems that the only public fuel stations here in the DC area that sell E85 are inside the DC beltway (and even then there are only a small handfull) I avoid that area like the plague. One would think that the huge stations here that specialize in low cost fuel like Sheetz or Wawa would be all over it. Their stations are always in high traffic areas and they always sell a high volume of fuel.

-Jay
__________________








Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 05:47 AM   #18
Registered Member
 
thornburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 162
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99metro View Post
I was running 85 (we have it here in the Denver area) and switching to 87 - mid-grade, I got enough MPG increase to warrant paying extra for better economy. I figured I was saving $3.00 a tank by using 87 vice 85. I saw a 10% increase in MPG over at least 4 tanks. I am currently experimenting with my first partial tank of 91.
I used to live out west, and they would frequently have 86 as the regular, 85 in some places.

"Back East" 87 is regular, 89 is mid (aka Plus), and 91 is premium (although Sunoco stations have FOUR grades, 87,89,91,93).

I've never tried anything but 87 in my car.
__________________
thornburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 06:55 AM   #19
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,723
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
Quote:
Originally Posted by thornburg View Post
I used to live out west, and they would frequently have 86 as the regular, 85 in some places.

"Back East" 87 is regular, 89 is mid (aka Plus), and 91 is premium (although Sunoco stations have FOUR grades, 87,89,91,93).

I've never tried anything but 87 in my car.
LOL, Sunoco... If you remember years back Sunoco used to have that dial on the side of the pump where you were supposed to select which additives you wanted in the gas. Grandpa always said that it didn't do anything but make you feel like you're doing something when you turned it.

-Jay
__________________

__________________








Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Matching EPA Type to My Car DastardlyDan Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 10-26-2009 06:16 AM
Hydrogen or H2O Systems 1Jal1 General Fuel Topics 4 10-11-2008 01:20 AM
Why did it take me so long to find this place? Baranfin Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 6 05-31-2008 04:17 PM
FE driving, good for mpg but bad for emissions? omgwtfbyobbq General Fuel Topics 21 05-16-2007 08:39 AM
An American Perspective on Driving in Canada rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 28 03-24-2006 09:42 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.