Restarting the FE challenge? - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2008, 10:44 PM   #11
Team GasMisers5!
landspeed's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 440
Country: United States
One of the things with the old challenge is that, if a team did very well early on, they would reach a brick wall of e.g. 240% above EPA. Then they will become the losers from then on,, whereas a team with gradual improvements up to 180% EPA might 'win' more often overall.

I think there should be some kind of formula, where you set your current mileage (e.g. 20% above EPA) for each car as the 'zero' mark. Then, if you are 15% above that, you score 15 points for the team. But also, there should be a 'delta' score, for the percentage change.

So, if someone starts at 20% above EPA, and gets to 80% above EPA, they will get 60 points + 60 delta points. If they remain at 80% above EPA next cycle, then they get 60 points + 0 delta points. This would give a way to reward people who keep high MPGs but can't improve as their MPGs are already so good.

Starting the competition with the car's starting % above EPA as being the 'zero' mark would allow newcomers and longer-term hypermilers to compete on a more level playing field.

If I join the competition I will be making some BIG jumps with my manual gearbox, when it gets fitted, and extreme aero mods


Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 (0 kWh used)
landspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 01:26 PM   #12
Registered Member
eugeneg20's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
Country: United States
i dont know much about this because i am new here. but if it was anywhere near what SNAX said than i would be for it since my car weights 2995pound and gets 30mpg.

eugeneg20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 06:21 AM   #13
BBsGarage's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 31
Country: United States
I'd be up for this if it still happening.
BBsGarage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 06:22 PM   #14
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to Monte_carloSS_kid
this sounds cool. I would just need a little help since I am new. I read the rules and such. I am running bone stock so i should help because I am going to improve MPG.
2000 Chevy Monte Carlo SS. Stock except for car audio. 18 city/25 highway.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Monte_carloSS_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 08:42 PM   #15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 446
Country: United States
Location: Charlotte nc
I'll participate
Philip1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 05:58 PM   #16
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Country: United States
Originally Posted by Snax View Post
I had an idea the other day that such a challenge should be indexed to weight. Something like Mile-tons Per Gallon. So my Escort for instance at 2450 lbs getting 40 mpg would be getting 1.225 tons x 40 mpg = 49 MTPG. Similarly, a 3 ton pickup getting 13 mpg would be getting 39 MTPG.

Such a system could make it viable for all comers to compete, regardless of vehicle type or weight. Aerodynamic cars will likely still have the advantage, but a 3 ton pickup turning in 20 MPG on the highway would be netting 60 MTPG, and that's actually pretty close to or possibly even exceeding the efficiency of much smaller vehicles.
This is my first post and this one really jumped at me brightly...
I was browsing the FE challenge stuff to see how it worked, and it really doesn't seem all that honest or accurate, but am sure there is other stuff to check out here.
A 40 ton rig at 5.6mpg == 224 mtpg. love the concept. Its REAL.
A 2300 pound sube at 40 == 1.15 x 40 == 46.
Anyhoo, great post.
scoob87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 06:22 PM   #17
Site Team / Moderator
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,667
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
I'd compete if vehicle weight was factored in... Sounds like fun.


Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 08:28 PM   #18
Registered Member
Snax's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
I'm not a railroad person, but I think I got the idea from them since a straight MPG calculation for them is really a worthless figure. On the other hand, we could flip this around to People Miles per Gallon and see some equally interesting figures. 1 person driving a Metro would get trounced by SUVs and trucks actually carrying 5 or more passengers.

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 03:57 PM   #19
Registered Member
theholycow's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
It's hard to quantify every quality that might be worth figuring in. There's power, acceleration, comfort, quantity of people, cargo carried, reliability, features, etc...

I don't think weight would actually be a good thing. It would send me to a higher position, sure, but that's because weight doesn't actually have that much effect on fuel economy for hypermilers (or for anyone who drives reasonably / highway driving).

Comparing by percent above EPA rating is a pretty fair way to do it, but could be divided into additional categories:
- automatic vs. manual
- heavily modified vs. stock/lightly modified
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 04:53 PM   #20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 446
Country: United States
Location: Charlotte nc
how about simply using the percent over the new EPA rating

Philip1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Stickers Matt Timion Fuelly Web Support and Community News 7 10-12-2006 04:48 PM
OBD2 GeoMetro onegammyleg Wanted to Buy 4 10-12-2006 10:48 AM
Brake and light inspection SupraRXZ General Maintenance and Repair 8 10-04-2006 02:06 AM
Any foreign language speakers here? Matt Timion General Discussion (Off-Topic) 12 09-19-2006 03:13 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.