Supercharger/Increased MPG? - Page 5 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-07-2010, 09:30 AM   #41
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEF View Post
yea but you are still spinning the screw (or turbine or whatever)

the pulley isn't set up on a clutch (that I know of) so you still have parasitics.

it may not be compressing but it is still spinning. there may be a reduced load if there is no pressure being accumulated but the load is still there.

(load being drag on the belt thus HP required)
Thats great....

I was addressing the fact that the poster stated superchargers make boost dependent on RPM and not based on load, which is only true under 100% throttle conditions. At part throttle boost is load dependent on superchargers due to the bypass valve.
__________________

__________________
GasSavers_broadwayline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 10:25 AM   #42
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_bobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 463
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadwayline View Post
At part throttle boost is throttle and RPM dependent on superchargers due to the bypass valve.
Fixed that for ya.

I came across this in the wikipedia article on superchargers, under the aircraft section:
Quote:
A supercharger has to take its drive power from the engine. Taking a single-stage single-speed supercharged engine, such as the Rolls Royce Merlin, for instance, the supercharger uses up about 150 horsepower (110 kW). Without a supercharger the engine would produce 750 hp (560 kW); with a supercharger the engine now produces 1,000 hp (750 kW), a total increase of 400 hp (750hp - 150 + 400), or a net gain of 250 hp (186 kW). This is where the principal disadvantage of a supercharger becomes apparent: The engine has to burn extra fuel to provide power to turn the supercharger. The increased charge density increases the engine's specific power and power to weight ratio, but also increases the engine's specific fuel consumption.
So in that case, the engine has a 1000 hp output with the fuel consumption of a 1150 hp engine. Yes, a clutch and bypass valve will help with that, but if you're not using the supercharger, why bother installing it?
A functioning supercharger will reduce the engine's efficiency (in terms of BSFC), and a fully bypassed supercharger isn't going to improve the efficiency of the engine as the engine will be operating just like a normally aspirated variant... The supercharger will only be dead weight.
__________________

GasSavers_bobski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 11:17 AM   #43
Registered Member
 
fowljesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 188
Country: United States
I'm working on a top secret charger that wouldn't take any power from the engine.
Think "Leaf Blower", but it's well beyand that.
fowljesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 12:50 PM   #44
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_bobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 463
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by fowljesse View Post
Think "Leaf Blower", but it's well beyand that.
Like this?
GasSavers_bobski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 02:49 AM   #45
Site Team
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 656
Country: United States
Maybe you're pre-compressing the air then opening a solenoid? Oh wait, that would be like a nitrous system.

-BC
__________________
Think you are saving gas? Prove it by starting a Gas Log, then conduct a proper experiment.
bobc455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 12:09 PM   #46
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_BEEF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,831
something along the lines of what thomas knight has done?

if so, I like the idea but it's pretty expensive.
__________________
Be the change you wish to see in the world
--Mahatma Gandhi



GasSavers_BEEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 01:57 PM   #47
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_bobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 463
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEF View Post
I like the idea but it's pretty expensive.
And heavy. The bank of batteries needed to run the contraption for more than a few seconds at a time will load the car down. And then there's the energy loss from charging and discharging the batteries to consider. It might be more practical on a car that's already hauling that stuff around, like a hybrid.
GasSavers_bobski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 02:21 PM   #48
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,259
Country: United States
Location: wiliamsburg virigina
I think a supercharger has it's place as long as you downsize the engine so it can run at a better BSFC, and only use the supercharger for those times when you need more power than the smaller engine is capable of producing.

That is also why I like the electric supercharger, since you only need to replenish the energy with the existing charging system and battery.

You would probably only use the supercharger less than 1 % of the time.

regards
Gary
__________________
R.I.D.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 08:30 PM   #49
Registered Member
 
fowljesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 188
Country: United States
Well, I found out that GM patented my idea a while ago so it's no secret.
I have a venturi air mover that produces more CFM than I would need. It takes about 60 psi from a standard air line to produce something like 800 CFM.
I would use an air compressor (I was thinking a tiny 2 stroke engine). I think this would produce the least parasitic loss, and a tiny 2-stroke would barely use gas. I would connect the throttles, and make a cam on the 2-stroke throttle, so the engine would produce just enough to keep the air tank full.
__________________

fowljesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not very precise mpg calculation larjerr Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 08-20-2012 02:03 AM
Tools you keep in the car? GasSavers_maximilian Experiments, Modifications and DIY 57 10-08-2009 09:41 PM
Keeping my distance in traffic khurt General Fuel Topics 8 09-07-2008 04:23 AM
When filling up today to check my mileage I had an issue. HondaTorneoSiR Experiments, Modifications and DIY 2 06-12-2008 07:28 AM
Electrical power and cars. DracoFelis Automotive News, Articles and Products 2 09-16-2006 02:31 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.