Truck lowering scheme - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-02-2009, 03:27 PM   #11
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
I can get the same or better mileage in my V8 full size 4x4 pickup than many can get in a Subaru station wagon, but that doesn't mean my truck is equivalently efficient.

__________________

__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 04:00 PM   #12
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to dkjones96
I've got factory skid plates as well and I'm sure they clean up aero under there.

Mileage also depends on the 4x4 system used. As THC pointed out a solid front axle tends to hang out there more than an IRS frontend would. Also, most 4x4 have the option of disconnecting the front axle from the wheels but systems like mine have no hubs so the front axle is always connected to the wheels. Nice for on-the-fly but a mileage sucker.
__________________

__________________
- Kyle
dkjones96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 05:54 PM   #13
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher View Post
What is your suggestion for comparison then?
Your stock vs. lowered Tempo comparison would be great for Tempos or similar cars. A comparison between similar stock and lowered 4x4s might be useful.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 07:33 PM   #14
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to dkjones96
I don't think gangbangers track mileage...
__________________
- Kyle
dkjones96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 08:02 PM   #15
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Country: United States
Generally 4x4s arent lowered either so finding a comparison between a stock and lowered 4x4 will be difficult. The only real way I see this working is for you to lower your truck and see what you get , but do it as cheaply and safely as possible. That way if there isnt much of a difference you can always swap back with no problems and not spending any more money.
OldCorolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 03:50 AM   #16
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
On the truck forum I frequent, where there are lots of lowered trucks (and even some lowered 4x4s), fuel economy is almost taboo. As soon as anyone mentions it, he gets a flurry of replies saying "If you want to save gas get a Honda".

Occasionally a fuel economy discussion gets missed by the haters. Those threads tend to sound like an HHO thread made by a new user here...people claim a 30% increase in fuel economy from a new muffler, etc. NOBODY on the truck forum ever indicates that they've used a gaslog or accurate pumping habits, and half the time they speak of miles per tank, or just say that they think it's that much better but haven't actually paid attention.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 04:52 AM   #17
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Country: United States
hahaha , sounds like fun.
OldCorolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:49 PM   #18
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
I would guess that lowering in a reasonable way would not pay for itself in fuel economy even over a whole lot of miles...except for a few cheap lowering tricks:
  • Removing blocks that hold the leaf springs above the axle(s).
  • De-cranking torsion bars, which I doubt the F350 has (it should have front leafs or coils).
  • As theclencher says, clamps. There are clamps made specifically for coil springs; I bought them at Pep Boys back in 1997. You could flip them inside-out to lift (by pushing coils apart) or lower (by clamping coils together).
Do check an F350 forum to make sure there aren't side-effects like bad U-joint angles or bottoming-out shocks before trying those ideas.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:57 PM   #19
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Found a picture of the coil spring clamp/expander:


In that picture, the assembled unit is setup for lowering. Flip the brackets over and it would lift. I ran one per spring for at least 30,000 miles on a 4,000 pound Cadillac without a problem, just a little clanking if the spring compressed more than they already had it compressed, but a 6,000 pound truck might need two per spring (both compressing the same two coils to eachother) to avoid breaking them.

Edit:
That picture came from http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/sh...hp?tid/1501769
Quote:
Go to Autozone/Kragen whatever and buy a set of "Coil Spring Clamps" (I have Mr. Gasket #1280's like below) About $10.00-15.00
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 07:38 AM   #20
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
The truck has leaf spring front an rear.

With regard to the Ford Tempo stock vs. lowered FE: They are gasoline cars, and aero mods don't help FE much because gas engine efficiency gets worse (due to throttling losses) as the load is decreased.

My F350 is a diesel, and the efficiency shouldn't suffer as much as the aero drag is reduced. Still, it's hard to spend lowereing the truck without some guarantee of FE gains.
__________________

__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partial fuel-up - when do you reset your trip odometer? johnclayton Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-30-2009 10:16 PM
drivetrain resistance bagpipe goatee General Fuel Topics 9 09-14-2008 10:04 PM
Feature Request: City vs Highway jethrographic Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-08-2008 10:43 AM
Excessive NOx emissions GasSavers_JoeBob General Maintenance and Repair 8 05-26-2008 02:07 PM
Alow myself to introduce... myself. trebuchet03 Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 10 03-29-2007 07:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.