Opinions - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2008, 07:49 PM   #11
Registered Member
skewbe's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
Originally Posted by Project84 View Post
...I would have to option to put my car up as collateral on the LOAN to purchase the PICC as long as I had title in hand.
LOL, I wonder if this came with a title

Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 08:39 AM   #12
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 618
Country: United States
got another email response from my local "customer consultant"...

HAFC is $995 and this is a quote from further down in the email:

"The upgrade to combine both technologies is expected to cost several more thousand dollars, but the PICC technology is not yet ready."


yeah, let me jump on THAT bandwagon... sure.

'09 Saturn Aura 2.4L
'94 Chevy Camaro Z28 (5.7L 6sp)
'96 Chevy C1500 (5.0L 5sp)
'08 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom
'01 KTM Duke 2
Project84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 06:36 AM   #13
Registered Member
thecheese429's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 82
Country: United States
Using a magnetic and electrical reaction to break down the fuel molecules into their elemental state, the PICC creates a plasma, which burns super efficiently and cleanly!
wow you're right about laughing!

...the vehicle traveling at 65 mph up a 30 degree incline for an hour would have obtained almost 200 mpg! When they shut off the engine, the researchers reported that it coasted on the plasma for another two minutes.
what does coasting have to do with "super efficient gas"? the engine will see the same friction as before, and if they're talking about the vehicle itself, it would have done it with gas too.

my advice? don't waste your money on this.
on the other hand, if you can try it for free......
Until this moment all that I have known
Is death's attempt at imitating life
And for the first time I am truly alive
-Becoming the Archetype
thecheese429 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 05:58 PM   #14
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Country: United States
well I typed a long-winded reply full of calculations. . . but it got deleted somehow. Suffice to say the math says the baseline they use breaks the laws of physics, and the claims they make actually far exceed the energy contained in a gallon of gasoline. . . conclusion: scammers, plain and simple.

samandw is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hey! From Lancaster, PA Mr. Pig Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 8 09-06-2007 05:42 AM
Not to get overly political on GS, but... theclencher Automotive News, Articles and Products 11 08-05-2007 11:14 AM
If you didn't like my last post, you'll love this one. Spinningmarkviii General Fuel Topics 2 05-07-2007 01:28 AM
I hear crickets GasSavers_davens General Fuel Topics 18 07-24-2006 07:01 PM
Speculate II: What kinda smack will a vacuum leak put on FE? SVOboy General Fuel Topics 7 04-09-2006 06:23 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.