VX o2 Sensor- Which one?
 

I know this have been asked many times and thought I'll just take my chances and getting one.

1. L1H1 NTK 24300 - $189.98

NTK 24300
5 Wire Wideband Oxygen Sensor
NTK L2H2
Replaces the Original 5 Wire L1H1
NTK # LZA-09-E1
Honda # 36531-P07-003
36531-P2M-A01
36531-P2M-A02
Motec # 57003

2. NTK 24301 - Same site - $179.98

NTK 24301
5 Wire Wideband Oxygen Sensor
Honda # 36531-PHM-A01
36531-PHM-A02

Yeah I have been looking at that and some people say it may be a hit or miss. Some said it is ntk.

I bought that one and it worked fine.

The first one. Look at the list of Honda part numbers... See the one with P07 in the middle? VX-specific parts will often have that middle string in their number.

I need one,

Is this the real deal?

Dave:)

I don't know of any other Civic VX concern that is so littered with confusion, misinformation and outright fraud than that of O2 sensor replacement. Call me a cynic but, as tempting as it may be, I cannot find much support for jmf's no-name $99.99 unit. "Worked fine" is relative. Simply unplug your malfunctioning (or functioning, for that matter) sensor and your Civic will "work fine" too. If you're willing to tolerate a potential 40% (!) drop in efficiency.
A quick search shows that we have many, many threads on the subject without any definitive results or recommendations. Only wish I had the time to become the authority on this subject. Any member with sufficient personal experience willing to weigh in?

This gaslog has one entry after installation on 11/20/2008:
https://www.gassavers.org/garage/viewgaslog/2260
Looks good there. One entry isn't enough, though.

jmf, who posted earlier in this thread, appears to have installed one around the same time and has a couple dozen gaslog entries after that:
https://www.gassavers.org/garage/viewgaslog/2402

I know that plenty of people have bought it. Anyone who has, post up...

To all,
Re-reading my post I see how one might take offense or be put off by my tone. Certainly this was not my intent. I am more than pleased with this site. A great majority of posts are informed and informative. All seem to be well intended. jmf has offered kind and helpful responses to many seeking assistance. I have no reason to believe jmf's recommendations are in any way misleading or self-serving. I am thankful for any and all feedback regarding this important matter.
Best wishes,
Miser

Claims that go unchallenged go unsupported. We must check up on things like this from time to time or else we could be giving bad advice.