Would we get better mileage runing 1/4 tank than always filling up?
Just wondering what the weight of the extra, in my case 15 gallons, fuel does to our mileage...? If diesel fuel is 7.206#/gallon...would the 108# savings benefit mpg much?
|
Quote:
I don't think it quantifiable in terms of the equipment we have to measure. The EPA says to remove excess weight to increase FE but I don't think 100# on a 3000# will show up. The lighter the car the better I guess. It definately helps with acceleration. Might want to do a search. I did some playing around with this in a Mazda 626 which has a 15 gallon tank and did several tanks with 4 gallons. No noticeable increase if FE. Plus it was a hassel to fill every 2-3 days. YMMV:) |
I had noticed that I got better milage towards the end of a tank with the Prius, so I tried only filling it part way. It seemed to help, but my technique was also improving, tires wearing, etc. I may try it again with the Ranger.
A co-worker that moved up from the south pointed out that they couldn't partially the tank. The humidity could lead to rusting in the tank. |
It really depends how you drive. If you are good at staying off the brakes (including engine braking) it won't make much difference, you will simply glide about 1/30 farther than normal for a given car (and have to accelerate 1/30 more).
If you are wasting a lot of energy braking then you will get about 1/30 worse mpg with a full tank. Note the 1/30 is 100 lbs of fuel in a 3000 lb car. A smaller car/fuel tank will have a different ratio. |
what skewbe said plus hills of any size...
|
I did see a gain carrying less gas,but after all the other measures taken since then, I didn't see the same loss when I filled all the way up again. It's cold now and I don't like getting out of the warm car to pump gas. Also the pump stops are just adding to low FE parking lot driving.
|
Quote:
|
Just do the math on if the weight affects things...
6.2 pounds per gallon (premium is 6.35 PPG) Added mass affects acceleration and climbing. As a heavy cyclist I can tell you for a fact, that mass and hills is bad. What you lose going up always exceeds what you gain going down, both in time and energy. |
Analyzing my commute since April (270 data points)yields these results:
Full tank: 54.5 mpg 3/4 tank: 54.7 mpg 1/2 tank: 54.7 mpg 1/4 tank: 54.5 mpg empty: 53.8 mpg I try to run the maximum per tank, and minimize the number of fillups. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.