Which one has better FE? CRX Si or DX?
Here's the deal. I owned a 91 CRX DX automatic(I know it sucks) and have a chance to pick up a 91 CRX Si parts car. I was thinking about just swapping the Si engine and transmission over to my car, definitely for the 5-speed. Just want to know if I should keep the DX motor with the transmission, or just go for the whole shebang.
Might just hunt for an HF transmission for the longer gears. |
The Si gears are really tight on the CRX (I have a bone stock 88 si) and at 60 mph you are already at 3000+ rpm's. A DX manual has longer gears (different final drive ratio) and would be better in FE in my opinion, and a HF even more.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The D15Z1 is spec'd as having peak torque at 4800 RPM, but it's a VTEC-E motor, so it changes cam profiles in the middle of its RPM range. It uses an HF-like low-end torque profile at low RPM, but switches to a more DX-like profile above that. The result being a more or less flat torque curve, but it hits a little peak at 4800, so that's where the peak torque spec lies. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Try these two threads https://crxcommunity.com/viewtopic.php?t=16427 https://crxcommunity.com/viewtopic.php?t=15913 |
Quote:
The DX 5th gear/final drive combo is very similar to the DX auto's 4th gear/final drive combo in terms of RPM-to-speed. I've gotten milage in the low 40s with both the D16A6 (Si engine) and D15B2 (DX, as I said earlier) engines, and nearly 46 mpg with a D16Z6 though the DX auto transmission. Top gear ratio * final drive: Si: 0.771 * 4.250 = 3.277 DX manual: 0.771 * 3.888 = 2.998 DX auto: 0.780 * 3.933 = 3.068 HF federal: 0.694 * 2.954 = 2.050 HF Cali: 0.694 * 3.250 = 2.256 Si/HF hybrid: 0.694 * 4.250 = 2.949 So the Si/HF combo is geared just a hair slower than a DX. |
I'd look for an hf and sell your dx :)
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.