Pickup tailgate up or down - SAE Studied - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-29-2007, 07:27 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
bones33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 180
Country: United States
Location: Apple Valley, CA
Pickup tailgate up or down - SAE Studied

See this link if this iterests you. http://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/ge...hi1/pickup.pdf

Results: Keep it up. Tonneaus MAY help.
__________________

bones33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 09:04 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Great find! Thanks.
__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 09:30 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
palemelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 364
Country: United States
If you look at the tables on page 8, the results are different for crew/extended cab than they are for regular cab / long bed. Ext cab - tailgate up, reg cab long bed - tailgate down.
palemelanesian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2007, 09:43 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
This report confirms what I suggested in another thread, that there is a specific zone behind the cab after which it makes sense to attempt to establish more laminar flow off the rear of pickups. A longer bed, with far less impact from cab length, will benefit more greatly from aerodynamic aids for this reason. I would argue that if one had a bed length nearly equal to the height of the cab to the bed, it would not make any significant difference, tailgate, mesh, tonneau, or whatever because there is virtually no opportunity to re-establish a laminar flow that close to the cab at anything but the slowest of speeds where the impact is nearly nil.

In short, I think it could be argued that longer beds net better aerodynamic possibilities and shorter beds provide less opportunity for improvement. The length of the cab is relatively insignificant.
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 03:36 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 135
Country: United States
I just watched part of the re-run of mythbusters on the pickup tailgates. you may loose .02 cd but if the 80+ lbs tailgate is removed wouldn't the mpg go up some if 100lbs = 1mpg. they didn't factor the weight reduction just focused on air disruption.
ffvben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 03:47 PM   #6
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I don't think that the weight reduction is worth nearly that much. Especially on something as heavy as a truck.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 04:33 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
It looks like Ford's lightest F150 is 4670 lbs. So knocking 80 lbs off that nets 4590, or a 1.7% weight reduction. One would be lucky if that translates to even half that much in fuel economy improvement considering all of the time most vehicles spend either cruising or stopped idling.
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 05:39 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
That's the problem with discussing FE in terms of MPG. A 1 MPG savings on a 50 MPG car is a very different animal than 1 MPG saved on a 15 MPG truck.

Removing 80 lbs might net around 1 MPG in the 50 MPG car. Not so likely on the truck.

L/100 km is better that way.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 06:10 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
VetteOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
Country: United States
now i know what I'm about to say has no testing they behind it or any 100% accurate Truth, but i know with s-10's that if you have a toneau cover that you will see a 1-2mpg increase even tho the thing weighs 80lbs(fiberglass with some metal subframe) several people that ive talked to have said they picked up a 1-2 mpg increase with it, not to mention the security and ability to leave somewhat valuable stuff fin the bed. Ive been thinking about making mine out of a steel or aluminum frame with sheet metal as a main covering. i calculated it out and it would be around 60-70 lbs minus the hinges and gas struts to keep it up. cost about half the price of a store bought one.

and yea a truck is meant for hauling stuff. throw oh lets say a 50 lb bag of sand in a car and your gonna notice it, throw it in a truck and it will be like a soda can...
VetteOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 07:11 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 313
Country: United States
Has anyone with a ScanGauge ever given feedback on up, down, off? Wouldn't take much to try!
__________________

__________________
2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding a Tank Size. Shifty54 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 04-13-2010 06:07 AM
Things To Look For When Buying A Civic Vx??? panamacolin General Fuel Topics 10 08-15-2008 03:57 PM
Sparrow Electric Car Matt Timion Electric and Solar powered 11 06-27-2006 08:50 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.