Minnesota mileage tax - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > The Pub > General Discussion (Off-Topic)
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-21-2007, 05:05 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 42
Country: United States
Minnesota mileage tax

The wonderful state of Minnesota it looking at a mieage tax.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/16736869.htm
This is just so dumb I do knot even know were to start.
__________________

ron22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:33 AM   #2
ELF
Registered Member
 
ELF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 245
Country: United States
Ya, that is stupid. If they pass that I will be forced to find a way to cheat.
__________________

__________________
ELF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:52 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 42
Country: United States
I did a few quick numbers
He is why take two vehicles using the EPA numbers for mileage on Hwy.
1) Honda Insight 66MPG Curb Weight around 2000lbs
2) Chevy Suburban 19MPG Curb Weight around 6000lbs
Lest assume the average driver drives 20,000 miles a year. Using $0.012 per mile for tax
Vehicle 1 will use 303.0303 gallons of gas and pay $0.792 a gallon for tax
Vehicle 2 will use 1052.632 gallons of gas and pay $0.228 a gallon for tax
ron22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 09:20 AM   #4
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
Ron22 -

I have always been in favor of taxing gas by the gallon, but this is nuts. The car industry must be behind this legislation.

SUVs and other heavier vehicles do more physical damage to the road, so it is only fair that they pay more.

CarloSW2
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 09:39 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 358
Country: United States
This is just obscene. The oil industry must be financing certain Twin Cities politicians.
repete86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 09:47 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
And they haven't mentioned semis... A 100,000lb vehicle getting 5mpg only pays the equivalent of a 5,000lb car if it gets 100mpg.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 12:57 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 675
Country: United States
This is a burecratic bunch of baloney! Their only issue is that legislators haven't allowed them to raise the tax per gallon, so they are trying to come up with a alternative way to bypass raising the tax, by changing the tax basis. This is also a very counter way to encourage gas efficiency.

Finally, he can say they won't keep the information, but I don't believe it. If it is available, someone will keep the information, somewhere, sooner or later.
Gary Palmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:52 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 409
Country: United States
We must punish the Hybrids! and efficient cars!! A switch on my VSS sensor will definetly be required if this ever happens. Uggh i can't get over the stupidity of it all. Stoopid Minnesotan's haha, I"m writing an angry letter.

::EDIT:: I just realized it doesnt mention that I'm from Minnesota, dont' want any fellow Minnesotans mad at me lol

Also, I sent off a letter today, off to the paper shredder it goes!
__________________
red91sit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 09:21 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
The Toecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 612
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to The Toecutter
Most of the roadwear is not caused by passenger cars, or even large pickups and SUVs. The vast majority of it is caused by large semi-trucks. Road wear caused by a vehicle will vary as a cube of the vehicle's weight or therabouts. An average semi-truck will cause about 70,000 times more road wear than a passenger car.

THAT is where the bulk of the road taxes should be collected. They don't like it? Less profitable but cheaper rail should be used in its place anyway.
__________________

The Toecutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recent Fuel-ups Graph Scale rcsheets Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 09-08-2008 03:11 AM
suggestion for stat comparison zahampton Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 09-04-2008 07:29 AM
Current TV spot merckrx General Fuel Topics 1 08-14-2008 06:36 AM
"active" aero grille slats on 06 civic concept MetroMPG General Fuel Topics 21 01-03-2006 12:02 PM
Garage now up and running! Matt Timion Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 12-01-2005 01:40 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.