Chrysler PT Cruiser - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2008, 02:58 PM   #11
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Country: United States
Originally Posted by Lug_Nut View Post
The PT (New Beetle, Prowler, Thunderbird, Mini) weren't intended to have maximized aerodynamic properties. Get over it. These were styling exercises that put primary emphasis on the exterior appealing to the expected tastes of the intended purchasers.
Trade the PT in for a Neon (Golf, LH sedan, LS, or what ever it was that prompted the mini).
I fit fine in my 01' PT as I stand 6'7" and being comfortable without my knees in the dash and head through the sunroof is my priority. I've made my PT the thing I enjoy most..Adding things to it every now and again just makes it look different and I like the car because of the aftermarket for it.

They (Chrysler) could have however, made a different tranny for the vehicle to help it with gas mileage...with a low automatic speed transmission and aerodynamic properties similar to a brick, it's a lose-lose. They could have made it better.

ucantcme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 05:18 PM   #12
Registered Member
Cathy06PT's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to Cathy06PT
I guess it's no so bad, Im sure it could be worse... :-) I still enjoy my PT.

Cathy06PT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 08:12 PM   #13
Registered Member
Mike T's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Country: United States
I thought the hunchback version was out of production now
2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
2006 smart fortwo BRABUS Canada 1 cdi cabriolet
2005 smart fortwo cdi pulse cabriolet
1966 Peugeot 404 Coupe Injection
Mike T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 09:22 AM   #14
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Country: United States
Using typical FE techniques, despite running pig rich Stage I tune, running larger rims and tires, stereo, etc - I manage to pull 25 mpgs consistently. It helps, however that my commute is something like 30/70 city/highway.
sakigt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 11:19 AM   #15
Registered Member
GasSavers_JoeBob's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 698
Country: United States
Originally Posted by ucantcme View Post
For the size, it probably has the worst MPG. I hate it!

300 miles on a 15gal tank is what I aim for, but manage to only get 275 plus or minus 20miles.

IMO, They should have made the PT's with 5 or 6spd autos and perhaps put alot less weight into the car!

Anyone else?
Comparing your mileage to EPA, looks like you're doing just fine. EPA for the manual transmission version of your car is 20 mpg combined town and highway. The new one is a bit better...23 mpg combined. And if you're otherwise happy with the car, then just do what you can to improve your mileage and enjoy!
"We are forces of chaos and anarchy. Everything they say we are we are, and we are very proud of ourselves!" -- Jefferson Airplane

Dick Naugle says: 1. Prepare food fresh. 2. Serve customers fast. 3. Keep place clean.

GasSavers_JoeBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:45 PM   #16
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 86
Country: United States
I've rented PTs on three different occasions, and have never averaged more than 17-18mpg. No, I did not "drive it like I rented it" (even though I did rent it). Poor aerodynamics alone cannot be blamed for such horrible mileage. My Evo, driven in the same manner, consistently gives me 22-23mpg, and Evos are not known for their fuel economy.

Hell, the F150 I rented gave me almost 17mpg....almost.
roadsterbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 08:03 AM   #17
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
I used to REQUEST the PT when I rented and the Neons were all out in the field. I'd get very high 20's, nearly 30 mpg in either the Neon car or PT truck versions of these common parts bin vehicles. Good ergonomics, clever interior design, not too bad a ride or seating position, and for $40/day, unlimited mileage, not a bad deal at all.
Would I buy one? No. I'd have to walk the last 100 yards home every night. My wife wouldn't let me park such a fugly truck in the driveway. I'd have to leave it down the street out of sight.
Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 09:44 AM   #18
Site Team / Moderator
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,704
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
When I rent I almost always get a Mercury Grand Marquis. I can reserve one through my Credit Card company for ~$30/day unlimited mileage and I get nearly 30 MPG out of them. Comfortable, lots of room, and as I always say "When in Florida, drive what the Floridians drive". My friends always ask if the old man I carjacked is still in the trunk, but when it comes time to drive somewhere it always seems that my car is the one chosen to go. Nobody wants to be in the back seat of a compact car or Taurus. Last time I rented I made a mistake though. I figured I wasn't going to drive it much, so I just asked for the cheapest car possible. They gave me a Mitsubishi Lancer, and I got exactly what I asked for. I was not happy in that car at all, even though I only drove it for one day.



Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scangauge 2 vs Supermid dcoyne78 Hypermiling 11 01-04-2011 06:06 AM
How do I start? Enter my first fuel up? thirtythreedragons Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 10-07-2009 06:18 AM
1994 Civic VX in Delaware $2400 McPatrick For Sale 5 01-16-2008 03:26 PM
Come see the 2007 East Coast HPV Challenge! trebuchet03 People Powered 2 05-23-2007 06:28 PM
If you're jealous of Matt, (or have 56k) don't look here. bagpipe goatee General Discussion (Off-Topic) 8 11-15-2005 06:24 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.