VW Jetta - from 1.4L to 1.5L (with better MPG) Why? - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-05-2022, 07:21 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 72
Country: United States
Location: left coast
VW Jetta - from 1.4L to 1.5L (with better MPG) Why?

My 2017 EA211 1.4L is imprssively fuel efficient.......

That being said, how does VOA get improved EPA numbers with a larger displacment?


I would point to a better drag co-efficient - but other factors may need to be considered.,

best to all,



ez
__________________

ezshift5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2022, 10:13 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,461
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Danderhall
Engines are getting more efficient with every passing year.
What you often find is that the slightly smaller engine is not optimum for the vehicle but the larger engine is.
I drove two Ford Cortinas, back in the day, and the 1.6L gave far better mpg than the 1.3L. Both engines were the same except displacement and both were from the same model year.
__________________

__________________
2009 Skoda Fabia Elegance 1.4 16V
JockoT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2022, 01:18 PM   #3
LDB
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Houston suburb
Posts: 1,358
Country: United States
Gearing, shift points, fuel mapping, aerodynamics, tire choice are the first few things that come to mind. I'm sure there are many other potential factors.
__________________
.
2023 Ford Escape ST-Line 1.5L Eco-boost AWD

LDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2022, 01:27 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,385
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
I'd agree with above. And increasingly tighter emissions regs forcing car makers to eek every tenth of an MPG out thier car. Some of the new VW group cars put the car in neutral and turn off the engine entirely on long hill descents.

I've often found smaller underpowered cars can be less efficient as you have to work them so much harder, some of the hills here I've been flat to the floor and knock it down two, sometimes three gears just to get up. In my more powerful cars, I'm in 6th, barely touching the throttle at all, just a nice lump of torque as the turbo spools and pulls you up.
__________________



Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2022, 10:03 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 57
Country: United States
It's definitely innovations from these years. Manufacturers got to compete with more efficient new models.
visorX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2022, 10:30 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 72
Country: United States
Location: left coast
I'm not ready for the "toaster" path of advancement (driving). In Naval Air - during the "Greatest Gen" days -- - - propellor aircraft to jet aircraft transition - the expression "Take it slow and easy if you want to get along with me" became the sane approach to the appropriate learning curve.........jets ate a lot of fuel, jets did not accelerate like prop aircraft............

You had to plan ahead - especially with a carrier landing...........

That's where I am - - - - planning ahead.

My 1.4L Jette is REALLY fuel efficient. And reliable. And fun to drive.

I know fossil fuel ain't forever. I know we have choices,.

Please forgive the rant.


ez
ezshift5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2022, 11:27 AM   #7
LDB
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Houston suburb
Posts: 1,358
Country: United States
Well, if Edmunds is to be believed, moving to a new Jetta would bump mpg city/hwy 1 and 2mpg respectively with 1 mpg increase in combined mpg. And a smaller fuel tank means slightly more often visiting the pumps.

https://www.edmunds.com/car-comparis...veh2=401921533
__________________
.
2023 Ford Escape ST-Line 1.5L Eco-boost AWD

LDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2022, 03:23 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,385
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
Or get TDI unit, and increase your economy by another 25% or more. Kinda miss the 90 MPG days now our fuel is near enough $12 a gallon...
__________________



Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2022, 01:41 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,854
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
Diesel isn't an option in the US anymore.
trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 10:57 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,385
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
I was thinking second hand, not new.
__________________

__________________



Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.