Kia Niro Hybrid instrumented test
 

2017 Kia Niro Test | Review | Car and Driver

Kia's new smallish crossover hybrid comes with three trims.

I was going to type some more but honestly I'm already bored out of my mind from the mention of "hybrid" and "crossover" in the same sentence. It's good for what it does. At least it's on the smaller side, kind of a step in the right direction with a crossover-obsessed public. Don't know of any crossovers (in our market) that are as efficient as this one, besides the Tesla.

Disappointing real World MPG for a hybrid in my opinion. They should have mated it to one of their strong little diesels engines, they would have 60 MPG as a starting point.

The 22 Niro's on Fuelly are only getting 43.3 and 45.7 US MPG average, it's not that big a car when you actually look at it, aerodynamics should be better than a full size SUV.

The problem with diesel hybrids is price. Hard enough here convincing people to pay extra for one or the other. With both having good low end torque, diesels and electric motors also don't have the synergy of motors with gasoline. Which means the gains aren't likely to be as great.

Depending on the mix of trims, the 43.3 to 45.7 can actually be good. I expect more midrange trims to sell than the higher MPG base one. Something else to keep in mind with the Niro and Ioniq, only North America has gotten all the efficiency tricks. European models still have the 12 volt battery for example.

Strong little diesel engines are few and far between in North America. I have rented turbo diesel Astra Tiquan and Megans in Europe over the past few years with 6 spds.

My first tank on my Niro, SX touring resulted in 5.1 L per 100 km or 55 mpg Imp. By choosing a lower model with smaller tyres no spare tire etc 60 mpg could be easily obtained.

The Niro is up to and better than the Vauxhall, VW and Renault re equipment.

Certainly quieter than a diesel.

My other car is a Miata ( MX5)