Eoc
i was reading my cars maunal and it says that the car when towed should not be towed with the front wheels on the ground, because of serious damage to the transmission. So i take it that EOC is out of the question so i don't mess up the tranny, right? and if so is there another option besidies pulse & glide in gear?
|
Quote:
|
well i tried that for a week, shifting to n and coast with the engine on and i got worse mpg. so i stopped that.
|
your car is new enough to have DFCO hence the worse mpg.
|
Quote:
If you have an automatic, then dont coast in Neutral. I dont know why people on here say it is okay... maybe they are rebuilt transmission salesmen. |
Coasting in neutral is FINE if the engine is running. No problem whatsoever. Automatics will frequently do this on their own. Just watch the tachometer drop to idle as you roll up to a stop - that's neutral.
In this case, coasting with the engine off is bad. Just make use of what you can do. I suggest trying engine-on coasting again. It's amazing how little bits of 150mpg will raise your trip average. You might consider a Scangauge to show you how and when to use this, though. |
Quote:
Quote:
See, you have a certain amount of kinetic energy stored in the car, and idling uses a certain amount of energy stored in fuel. When you DFCO, you use your stored kinetic energy not only to move the car, but to turn the engine a lot faster than necessary, pumping air past a closed throttle and fighting engine friction. When you neutral coast, you use less energy all total; the amount of gas you spend idling is less than the amount of gas you'd have to spend later if you had chosen DFCO instead. Quote:
https://www.gassavers.org/showthread.php?t=8150 Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The effect is similar but it doesn't demonstrate the safety of neutral coasting. Nonetheless, neutral coasting is safe in common automatic transmissions. I've never ever heard of anyone for whom it caused a problem. |
Quote:
ask a person who knows, such as a reputable transmission mechanic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
To be fair I did a search to see why this bit of information is not widely known. This took 14 seconds to find: action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/669010.page In short, don't do it. The tranny hydraulic pump is driven by the input shaft from the torque convertor. Therefore if the output shaft is spinning at 50mph and the engine is idling it won't be delivering the required pressure to the tranny. It's the same as running your engine at 3000rpm with an oil pump delivering 1000rpm of oil pressure. The result is increased wear, burnt tranny fluid and a premature visit to the tranny shop. Plus it's dangerous, vehicle dynamics are balanced around an on load system, when you unload that system - coasting in neutral, the vehicle is inherently unstable. Try a sharp turn in neutral sometime and you'll get the idea. |
i will say this. when i coasted in D for example getting up to 60mph and then coasting until 50-55mph i got 37.5 mpg. thinking that coasting in N since i could go futher, doing the same speed my mpg went down to 36 down more to 33. but with a scangauge or the like to see whats going on. i'm going to have to stay with coasting in D since i know that works. you all can see my gaslog and see it go down
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, in D with the torque converter unlocked and your foot off the gas, the engine speed goes WAY down. Depending on your road speed, engine may get very close to idle. Some people with automatics report that their engine does not go completely down to idle when in N. Perhaps their computer is keeping the speed up to keep the tranny cool, that was one proposed explanation (another being fluid resistance in the tranny transmitting small amounts of power). Can someone with a tranny temp gauge or ScanGauge give us the straight dope on this? Does your tranny temp go up while neutral coasting, and if so, how much? My ELM327 ought to show up soon, so I'll be able to log some data too. Quote:
*: BTW, is your idea for front or rear wheel drive? Having the front wheels drag slightly from engine braking will upset the car differently from having the rear wheels do so...and then there's weight distribution, pavement changes, general differences in the car and the driver... If you're not confident in your safety while coasting in neutral, then you definitely should not do it. Most people who do neutral coasting are fine, we manage to survive without being able to accelerate away from a deer crossing the road or whatever, and do not have handling problems. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
The 'vehicle is inherently unstable?' Really? I wonder how I didn't notice that while P&Ging and driving around turns in "N." I mean, of the car is 'inherently unstable' it would take an awful lot of work to keep it on the road, right? You don't think I'd notice that? I'm surprised I didn't fling my Camry right off the road with all that unstable-ness. |
Every auto I have seen the primary pump is driven by flanges off the torque converter, it works whenever the engine is running.
Without the primary pump you are in trouble. I know it would wreck the early Z trannies to tow them. regards gary |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyway, yes, it's good for EOC. AFAIK, Saturn automatic transmissions are more similar to servo-operated manual transmissions than common automatics, due to Saturn's history as a transmission company or something. Here's the folks who would know: https://groups.google.com/groups?q=re...vel+saturn+sl2 |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.