bobc455 |
07-09-2008 08:28 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue
(Post 110214)
I would think you would need to replace the tank as well. I know GM used special anti slosh tanks on fuel injected vehicles. Carbs don't care because they ran off of the fuel in the bowl of the carb. If there was a momentary interruption in the fuel flow due to sloshing in the tank the engine kept running. With fuel injection the vehicle stalls. I remember my dad had an early model Chevy Lumina minivan that did not have a good anti-slosh tank in it. He said the van would start sputtering at 1/4 tank.
|
Bingo.
You don't NEED to replace the tank, but it is a good idea if financially possible (a custom-made FI tank for an older car can run about $1000 - https://www.rockvalleyantiqueautoparts.com/catalog.htm). But for me that was never an option, so I use my factory tank and just make sure the car never gets below 100%.
My car has never stalled due to lack of fuel, but it has ruined several fuel pumps from overheating when fuel wasn't available to keep the pump cool (see below).
The new tanks will accommodate internal pumps (which are best for these scenarios, although I have always used external), and will have the internal baffling to minimize slosh away from the pickup.
Quote:
Originally Posted by froggy81500
(Post 110202)
Its the way the regulation is done. The regulator bleeds off extra fuel pressure thru the return line.
|
It works a bit differently than that. On a carbed car, the pump only pumps what is required by the engine. On an FI car, the pump is always pumping 100% of its rated flow, and the leftovers go back to the tank. So if your pump can do 100 gallons/hour, it will pump 100 gallons/hour and the regulator will maintain pressure but return 96 gallons/hour back to the tank. This is to keep the pump cool, by always letting it flow 100% of volume, these pumps are very sensitive to overheating and the fuel is what cools the pump.
-Bob C.
|