GM offers gas-price cap for SUV buyers - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > News and Articles > Automotive News, Articles and Products
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-30-2006, 09:25 AM   #1
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
GM offers gas-price cap for SUV buyers

I'm a bit surprised no one has mentioned this yet:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060524/.../gm_gas_rebate

Excerpt:

DETROIT - Aiming to capitalize on consumer angst about the high cost of gasoline, General Motors Corp. on Tuesday said it would cap pump prices at $1.99 for customers in California and Florida who buy certain vehicles by July 5.

One hitch to the promotion is that customers must also agree to enroll in the OnStar vehicle diagnostic service, which is free for the first year but after that will cost $16.95 a month. The other is that many of the eligible vehicles are serious gas guzzlers.

The offer is good for 2006 and 2007 model year vehicles. ...
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 09:39 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Recent GM marketing has really started to irritate me.

GM Canada is promoting a similar deal: 20 cents off per liter on various cars/trucks.

The key in both campaigns is the discount only lasts one year.

This is no different from credit card companies that lure people with low introductory interest rates, and then slam you with 18% after the promotion period ends. With the main difference being you're stuck driving a vehicle that gets worse mileage than you might have chosen without the discount. AND fuel will be even more expensive in a year than it is today.

Another tag line on a spate of recent Tahoe ads here: "You don't need a smaller car - you need a smarter car."

To which I would respond to GM: "You don't need to offer incentives and questionable marketing to get people to buy your inefficient vehicles - you need to get serious about making more efficient vehicles."

I find I have little respect for manufacturers that don't make at least one efficient, small car.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 10:42 AM   #3
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
I find I have little respect for manufacturers that don't make at least one efficient, small car.
"its alright, soon he will be dead... and you will be fine... you always are"

sorry i had to throw that quote in there.
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 11:00 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
95metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 498
To all MetroMPG said..."Hear, hear!"

As for GM building more efficient vehicles, it won't happen until Chrysler or Ford makes a major move towards it. As I said before, GM is always reactive, not proactive.

Chrysler seems to be on a major horsepower kick right now so I guess they're out.

Ford seems to be the US manufacturers' last hope. At least it seems like they are putting more effort into hybrids and EVs.

Still, someone needs to come up with some American competition to the Prius and Insight. I really don't mind Japanese cars, but at least the American manufacturers should somehow prove that they care. Come on, Chevy! Build a hybrid Metro!
__________________
95metro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 11:14 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Quote:
Chrysler seems to be on a major horsepower kick right now so I guess they're out.
Yeah, don't get me started on the Dodge Caliber tv spots that blatantly use Hemi V8 sound effects in the background in the driving shots... Has anyone else seen (heard) these?

Chrysler builds a smallish car, and then they figure the best way to market it is to make it sound like a guzzler?

I read somewhere that DCX got in some trouble because of that (misleading advertising), but wasn't able to dig up any good sources when I Googled.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 11:30 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
95metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Yeah, don't get me started on the Dodge Caliber tv spots that blatantly use Hemi V8 sound effects in the background in the driving shots... Has anyone else seen (heard) these?
I haven't heard that. I tend to mute commercials...

They offer three engines in the Caliber - thankfully at least one of them gets 35 mpg on the hwy, but they're all mild to wild guzzlers in town. I am impressed with the ingenuity of the drive system.

But, you are right - it's a horrible way to advertise. They're just catering to people's lust for big power.

Of course, if the manufacturers wouldn't build the powerful vehicles people wouldn't be buying them. Look at the mid-late 70s. Even Mustangs, Camaros, and Firebirds were wheezing, anemic vehicles with (relatively) decent mileage...and the Mustang II was one of the best selling Mustangs...people still bought them regardless of what the manufacturers built.
__________________
95metro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 10:56 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,325
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_Ryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95metro
Still, someone needs to come up with some American competition to the Prius and Insight. I really don't mind Japanese cars, but at least the American manufacturers should somehow prove that they care. Come on, Chevy! Build a hybrid Metro!

Suzuki/geo/Chevy already makes a hybrid, the Twin Hybrid, (seats 4, I'm pretty sure)

slightly smaller then the metro, got 85mpg, a few years back it was in Popular Science magazine in the list of "cars amaricans don't want" because it was "funny looking" and "not smooth enough" but what do you exspect for a $9000 car? so they did a good job of killing off the demand for it, thanks Poplular Mecanics!
GasSavers_Ryland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 06:04 AM   #8
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
Suzuki/geo/Chevy already makes a hybrid, the Twin Hybrid, (seats 4, I'm pretty sure)

slightly smaller then the metro, got 85mpg, a few years back it was in Popular Science magazine in the list of "cars amaricans don't want" because it was "funny looking" and "not smooth enough" but what do you exspect for a $9000 car? so they did a good job of killing off the demand for it, thanks Poplular Mecanics!
What a cool car! I'd buy it.
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 06:23 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
95metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
Suzuki/geo/Chevy already makes a hybrid, the Twin Hybrid, (seats 4, I'm pretty sure)
<IMG style="; WIDTH: expression(this.width > 800 ? 800: true); max-width: 800px" alt="" src="http://eur.news1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/xp/dennis/20060306/19/3920655858.jpg" border=0>
slightly smaller then the metro, got 85mpg, a few years back it was in Popular Science magazine in the list of "cars amaricans don't want" because it was "funny looking" and "not smooth enough" but what do you exspect for a $9000 car? so they did a good job of killing off the demand for it, thanks Poplular Mecanics!
No kidding...I'd buy one too. Were they ever actually released? Now I'll have to do some Googling...

http://www.jcars.ca/index.cfm?spec=28
http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/Ar...articleID=4127
http://www.stevejarvinmotors.com.au/suzuki/concept/

Crap...they're japanese only minicars. Two-seaters, but rated at 75 mpg...easily 100+ mpg with FE driving. Check out this dash! Definitely based on the Swift-clone line I would say - just look at those wheel covers and wiper/turn signal controls.

__________________
95metro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 09:55 AM   #10
Registered Member
 
psyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 443
I saw that a week or so ago. This from a company going broke. I had to LMAO.
__________________
09 HCHII, w/Navi
07 Mazda3 S Touring, 5MT
Mild Hypermiler or Mad Man?
psyshack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Matching EPA Type to My Car DastardlyDan Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 10-26-2009 06:16 AM
Hydrogen or H2O Systems 1Jal1 General Fuel Topics 4 10-11-2008 01:20 AM
The Downside of Fuelly RossRoy General Fuel Topics 4 09-07-2008 03:32 AM
An American Perspective on Driving in Canada rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 28 03-24-2006 09:42 PM
"active" aero grille slats on 06 civic concept MetroMPG General Fuel Topics 21 01-03-2006 12:02 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.